GI Pharmacology · Module 6 of 8
Nucleos(t)ide analogues for hepatitis B · Direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C · Hepatitis D management · N-acetylcysteine and acute liver failure
ALF = acute liver failure · ALT = alanine aminotransferase · CYP2E1 = cytochrome P450 2E1 · CYP3A4 = cytochrome P450 3A4 · DAA = direct-acting antiviral · HBsAg = hepatitis B surface antigen · HBV = hepatitis B virus · HCV = hepatitis C virus · HDV = hepatitis D virus · NA = nucleos(t)ide analogue · NAC = N-acetylcysteine · NAPQI = N-acetyl-para-benzoquinoneimine · NTCP = sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide · P-gp = P-glycoprotein · PPI = proton pump inhibitor · SVR12 = sustained virologic response at 12 weeks · TAF = tenofovir alafenamide · TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
| Agent | Resistance Profile | Key Advantage | Key Caution / Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entecavir | High barrier: requires 3 concurrent RT mutations in treatment-naive | First-line; once daily oral; suppresses HBV DNA to undetectable in majority | Substantially less effective in lamivudine-experienced patients (lamivudine resistance mutations lower the entecavir resistance barrier); use TDF instead after lamivudine failure |
| TDF | No documented resistance in clinical practice | Preferred after lamivudine failure; first-line option in treatment-naive | Nephrotoxicity and reduced bone mineral density with prolonged use; monitor renal function and bone density; switch to TAF in renal impairment |
| TAF | No documented resistance | Higher intrahepatic drug concentration at lower plasma dose → significantly less nephrotoxicity and bone density loss than TDF | Preferred in patients with renal impairment or osteoporosis risk; equivalent antiviral efficacy to TDF |
| Lamivudine | Low barrier: resistance in ~20% per year of treatment (YMDD mutations) | Historical first-line; inexpensive; still used in resource-limited settings | Not recommended as first-line therapy; resistance compromises response to entecavir; use TDF if lamivudine failure occurs |
Co-administration of amiodarone with sofosbuvir-containing direct-acting antiviral regimens has caused serious and fatal symptomatic bradycardia, including complete heart block requiring pacemaker insertion, and cardiac arrest. The interaction can occur even when amiodarone was discontinued weeks before starting sofosbuvir, because amiodarone has an elimination half-life of 40 to 55 days and tissue concentrations remain high long after stopping. Amiodarone is an absolute contraindication to sofosbuvir-based regimens. Always obtain a complete medication history before starting hepatitis C therapy, including recently discontinued drugs. If a patient on amiodarone requires hepatitis C treatment, a sofosbuvir-free regimen must be used, and cardiology consultation is recommended.
| Author / Source | Title | Publication |
|---|---|---|
| Katzung BG, ed. | Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 15th ed. — Chapter on Gastrointestinal Pharmacology | McGraw-Hill; 2021 |
| Brunton L, Knollmann B, Hilal-Dandan R, eds. | Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 14th ed. | McGraw-Hill; 2023 |
| Terrault NA et al. | AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B | Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1560–1599 |
| Lok AS et al. | Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Hepatology. 2016;63(1):284–306 |
| AASLD-IDSA | HCV guidance: recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C | Hepatology. 2018;68(2):827–879 |
| Roth A et al. | Bulevirtide monotherapy or with pegylated interferon alfa-2a for chronic hepatitis D (MYR204) | Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1399–1409 |
| Rumack BH, Matthew H | Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity | Pediatrics. 1975;55(6):871–876 |
| Lee WM et al. | Intravenous N-acetylcysteine improves transplant-free survival in early stage non-acetaminophen acute liver failure | Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):856–864 |
| O’Grady JG et al. | Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure (King’s College Criteria) | Gastroenterology. 1989;97(2):439–445 |