Chapter 2 · Module 3 of 5 · Pharmacokinetics
CYP450 isoforms, Phase I and II reactions, low- vs. high-extraction hepatic clearance, enzyme induction and inhibition, and pharmacogenomic prodrug interactions
Section 1 — Phase I
CYP450 Isoform Reference Table
| Isoform | Key Substrates | Key Inhibitors | Key Inducers |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP3A4 | Statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, atorvastatin), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers, many others (~50% of drugs) | Azole antifungals, macrolides, ritonavir, grapefruit (intestinal, irreversible 24–72 h) | Rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, St. John's wort |
| CYP2C9 | Warfarin (S-enantiomer), NSAIDs, phenytoin, sulfonylureas | Fluconazole, amiodarone, metronidazole | Rifampin, carbamazepine |
| CYP2C19 | PPIs (omeprazole, pantoprazole), clopidogrel (activation), diazepam, SSRIs | Omeprazole, fluconazole, fluvoxamine | Rifampin |
| CYP2D6 | Codeine (activation to morphine), tramadol, TCAs, SSRIs, metoprolol, tamoxifen (activation to endoxifen) | Fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, quinidine | None clinically significant |
| CYP1A2 | Theophylline, clozapine, caffeine, olanzapine | Fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin | Cigarette smoking, omeprazole |
Acetaminophen toxicity: CYP2E1 converts acetaminophen → NAPQI, a reactive electrophile. Normally conjugated by glutathione. In overdose or glutathione depletion (fasting, chronic alcohol use): NAPQI accumulates → hepatocyte necrosis. Antidote: NAC replenishes glutathione. Most effective within 8 hours of ingestion.
Section 2
Glucuronidation, Acetylation, and Clinical Consequences
Glucuronidation (UGT Enzymes)
Major Conjugation Pathway
Acetylation (NAT2 Enzyme)
Slow vs. Rapid Acetylator Phenotype
Section 3
Capacity-Limited vs. Flow-Limited Hepatic Drug Elimination
| Feature | Low-Extraction (Capacity-Limited) | High-Extraction (Flow-Limited) | Clinical Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction ratio | < ~0.3 | > ~0.7 | Determines first-pass magnitude |
| Rate-limiting factor | Enzyme activity and drug concentration | Hepatic blood flow | Dictates which interventions change clearance |
| Effect of enzyme inhibitor | Large rise in plasma level — toxicity risk | Smaller effect than expected | Inhibitor interactions most dangerous for low-extraction drugs |
| Reduced blood flow (cirrhosis, hypotension) | Minimal effect on clearance | Major rise in plasma level — toxicity risk | Reduce high-extraction drug doses in cirrhosis or low-output states |
| Examples | Warfarin, phenytoin, theophylline, diazepam | Lidocaine, morphine, propranolol, verapamil | Know which category before adjusting dosing |
Section 4
Induction (Treatment Failure) vs. Inhibition (Toxicity)
Enzyme Induction
Faster Metabolism → Lower Levels
Enzyme Inhibition
Slower Metabolism → Higher Levels
Sections 5 & 6
Metabolizer Phenotype Consequences for Prodrugs
| Drug | CYP | Poor Metabolizer Effect | Ultrarapid Metabolizer Effect | Key Clinical Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codeine | 2D6 | No analgesia (no morphine generated) | Morphine toxicity, respiratory depression — FDA black box warning | Avoid in breastfeeding mothers; avoid CYP2D6 inhibitors with codeine |
| Clopidogrel | 2C19 | Inadequate platelet inhibition → stent thrombosis — FDA black box warning | Possibly greater effect (uncertain clinical significance) | Consider prasugrel or ticagrelor in poor 2C19 metabolizers; prefer pantoprazole over omeprazole with clopidogrel |
| Tamoxifen | 2D6 | Low endoxifen → higher breast cancer recurrence risk | Higher endoxifen (uncertain benefit) | Avoid fluoxetine and paroxetine with tamoxifen; use sertraline or venlafaxine if antidepressant is needed |
| Warfarin | 2C9 | Reduced clearance → elevated INR, bleeding risk at standard doses | Possible dose resistance | Use lower doses in 2C9 poor metabolizers; incorporate genotype in dosing algorithm |
The prodrug reversal rule: For prodrugs (codeine, clopidogrel, tamoxifen), the usual pharmacogenomic consequences are reversed. A CYP2D6 inhibitor added to codeine does not reduce toxicity risk — it eliminates efficacy by preventing morphine formation. Adding fluoxetine or paroxetine to a tamoxifen regimen does not reduce tamoxifen's side effects — it may reduce cancer protection by lowering active endoxifen levels.
References
| Author / Source | Title | Publication |
|---|---|---|
| Katzung BG, ed. | Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 15th edition | McGraw-Hill, 2021 |
| Brunton LL, Knollmann BC, eds. | Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 14th edition | McGraw-Hill, 2023 |
| Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC, eds. | Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 13th edition | McGraw-Hill, 2018 |
| Zanger UM, Schwab M | Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation | Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013; 138(1):103–141 |
| Weinshilboum R, Wang L | Pharmacogenomics: precision medicine and drug response | Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2017; 92(11):1711–1722 |
| Cascorbi I | Drug interactions — principles, examples and clinical consequences | Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 2012; 109(33–34):546–556 |
| Scott SA, et al. | Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy | Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013; 94(3):317–323 |
| US Food and Drug Administration | Codeine and tramadol products: drug safety communication — safety labeling changes and new black box warning on use in children and nursing mothers | FDA, 2017 |
| Goetz MP, et al. | The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen | Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2007; 101(1):113–121 |
| Rowland M, Tozer TN | Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Concepts and Applications, 4th edition | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011 |