Chapter 2  ·  Module 3 of 5  ·  Pharmacokinetics

Metabolism and Biotransformation

CYP450 isoforms, Phase I and II reactions, low- vs. high-extraction hepatic clearance, enzyme induction and inhibition, and pharmacogenomic prodrug interactions


Abbreviations: CYP = cytochrome P450  ·  UGT = UDP-glucuronosyltransferase  ·  NAT2 = N-acetyltransferase 2  ·  NAPQI = N-acetyl-para-benzoquinone imine  ·  NAC = N-acetylcysteine  ·  INR = international normalized ratio  ·  SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor  ·  TCA = tricyclic antidepressant  ·  PPI = proton pump inhibitor  ·  NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Section 1 — Key CYP Isoforms — Substrates, Inhibitors, and Inducers

Section 1 — Phase I

CYP450 Isoform Reference Table

Isoform Key Substrates Key Inhibitors Key Inducers
CYP3A4 Statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, atorvastatin), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers, many others (~50% of drugs) Azole antifungals, macrolides, ritonavir, grapefruit (intestinal, irreversible 24–72 h) Rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, St. John's wort
CYP2C9 Warfarin (S-enantiomer), NSAIDs, phenytoin, sulfonylureas Fluconazole, amiodarone, metronidazole Rifampin, carbamazepine
CYP2C19 PPIs (omeprazole, pantoprazole), clopidogrel (activation), diazepam, SSRIs Omeprazole, fluconazole, fluvoxamine Rifampin
CYP2D6 Codeine (activation to morphine), tramadol, TCAs, SSRIs, metoprolol, tamoxifen (activation to endoxifen) Fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, quinidine None clinically significant
CYP1A2 Theophylline, clozapine, caffeine, olanzapine Fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin Cigarette smoking, omeprazole

Acetaminophen toxicity: CYP2E1 converts acetaminophen → NAPQI, a reactive electrophile. Normally conjugated by glutathione. In overdose or glutathione depletion (fasting, chronic alcohol use): NAPQI accumulates → hepatocyte necrosis. Antidote: NAC replenishes glutathione. Most effective within 8 hours of ingestion.

Section 2 — Phase II Reactions — Conjugation

Section 2

Glucuronidation, Acetylation, and Clinical Consequences

Glucuronidation (UGT Enzymes)

Major Conjugation Pathway

  • Attaches glucuronic acid → water-soluble conjugate, renally or biliarily excreted
  • Morphine-6-glucuronide: active opioid metabolite — accumulates in renal failure, causes prolonged sedation and respiratory depression
  • UGT enzymes immature at birth — slow neonatal glucuronidation
  • Gray baby syndrome: chloramphenicol accumulates in neonates → cardiovascular collapse

Acetylation (NAT2 Enzyme)

Slow vs. Rapid Acetylator Phenotype

  • Substrates: isoniazid, hydralazine, procainamide, dapsone
  • Slow acetylators (40–70% in European and Middle Eastern populations): drug accumulates more
  • Isoniazid: slow acetylators → more peripheral neuropathy and hepatotoxicity risk
  • Hydralazine and procainamide: slow acetylators → more drug-induced lupus syndrome
Section 3 — Hepatic Clearance — Low-Extraction vs. High-Extraction

Section 3

Capacity-Limited vs. Flow-Limited Hepatic Drug Elimination

Feature Low-Extraction (Capacity-Limited) High-Extraction (Flow-Limited) Clinical Implication
Extraction ratio < ~0.3 > ~0.7 Determines first-pass magnitude
Rate-limiting factor Enzyme activity and drug concentration Hepatic blood flow Dictates which interventions change clearance
Effect of enzyme inhibitor Large rise in plasma level — toxicity risk Smaller effect than expected Inhibitor interactions most dangerous for low-extraction drugs
Reduced blood flow (cirrhosis, hypotension) Minimal effect on clearance Major rise in plasma level — toxicity risk Reduce high-extraction drug doses in cirrhosis or low-output states
Examples Warfarin, phenytoin, theophylline, diazepam Lidocaine, morphine, propranolol, verapamil Know which category before adjusting dosing
Section 4 — Enzyme Induction and Inhibition

Section 4

Induction (Treatment Failure) vs. Inhibition (Toxicity)

Enzyme Induction

Faster Metabolism → Lower Levels

  • Onset: gradual (1–3 weeks); offset: gradual after stopping
  • Effect: lower plasma concentrations → treatment failure
  • Rifampin: most potent inducer (CYP3A4, 2C9) — reduces substrate levels 80–90%
  • Others: carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, St. John's wort
  • Key interactions: rifampin + warfarin (loss of anticoagulation), rifampin + oral contraceptives (failure), St. John's wort + cyclosporine (rejection)

Enzyme Inhibition

Slower Metabolism → Higher Levels

  • Onset: rapid (hours to days); offset: rapid (except mechanism-based)
  • Effect: higher plasma concentrations → toxicity
  • CYP3A4: azole antifungals, macrolides, ritonavir — statin myopathy, cyclosporine toxicity
  • CYP2C9: fluconazole, amiodarone → potentiate warfarin → bleeding
  • CYP2D6: fluoxetine, paroxetine → raise TCA levels, abolish codeine analgesia
  • Mechanism-based (irreversible): grapefruit (24–72 h), erythromycin, clarithromycin
Sections 5 & 6 — Pharmacogenomics and Prodrug Activation

Sections 5 & 6

Metabolizer Phenotype Consequences for Prodrugs

Drug CYP Poor Metabolizer Effect Ultrarapid Metabolizer Effect Key Clinical Action
Codeine 2D6 No analgesia (no morphine generated) Morphine toxicity, respiratory depression — FDA black box warning Avoid in breastfeeding mothers; avoid CYP2D6 inhibitors with codeine
Clopidogrel 2C19 Inadequate platelet inhibition → stent thrombosis — FDA black box warning Possibly greater effect (uncertain clinical significance) Consider prasugrel or ticagrelor in poor 2C19 metabolizers; prefer pantoprazole over omeprazole with clopidogrel
Tamoxifen 2D6 Low endoxifen → higher breast cancer recurrence risk Higher endoxifen (uncertain benefit) Avoid fluoxetine and paroxetine with tamoxifen; use sertraline or venlafaxine if antidepressant is needed
Warfarin 2C9 Reduced clearance → elevated INR, bleeding risk at standard doses Possible dose resistance Use lower doses in 2C9 poor metabolizers; incorporate genotype in dosing algorithm

The prodrug reversal rule: For prodrugs (codeine, clopidogrel, tamoxifen), the usual pharmacogenomic consequences are reversed. A CYP2D6 inhibitor added to codeine does not reduce toxicity risk — it eliminates efficacy by preventing morphine formation. Adding fluoxetine or paroxetine to a tamoxifen regimen does not reduce tamoxifen's side effects — it may reduce cancer protection by lowering active endoxifen levels.

References

Author / Source Title Publication
Katzung BG, ed. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 15th edition McGraw-Hill, 2021
Brunton LL, Knollmann BC, eds. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 14th edition McGraw-Hill, 2023
Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC, eds. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 13th edition McGraw-Hill, 2018
Zanger UM, Schwab M Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013; 138(1):103–141
Weinshilboum R, Wang L Pharmacogenomics: precision medicine and drug response Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2017; 92(11):1711–1722
Cascorbi I Drug interactions — principles, examples and clinical consequences Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 2012; 109(33–34):546–556
Scott SA, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013; 94(3):317–323
US Food and Drug Administration Codeine and tramadol products: drug safety communication — safety labeling changes and new black box warning on use in children and nursing mothers FDA, 2017
Goetz MP, et al. The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2007; 101(1):113–121
Rowland M, Tozer TN Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Concepts and Applications, 4th edition Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011