Question 0 of 18

Drug Classification  ·  Questions 1–6

Identify the pharmacological class or categorical label for each drug or receptor. Vocabulary preparation is sufficient to answer every question in this section.

Question 1

Which of the following is classified as a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody?

  • ANatalizumab
  • BCidofovir
  • CValganciclovir
  • DRituximab

Correct Answer

D — Rituximab

Rationale

Rituximab is classified as a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. It targets the CD20 antigen expressed on B lymphocytes and depletes CD20-positive cells through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and direct apoptosis induction. Natalizumab is an anti-alpha-4-integrin monoclonal antibody. Cidofovir is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate antiviral. Valganciclovir is the oral L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir.

Question 2

Which of the following antiviral agents is classified as having antiviral activity against adenovirus?

  • AGanciclovir
  • BCidofovir
  • CAcyclovir
  • DOseltamivir

Correct Answer

B — Cidofovir

Rationale

Cidofovir is classified as having antiviral activity against adenovirus, in addition to cytomegalovirus and other DNA viruses. Ganciclovir's spectrum is limited to herpesviruses and does not include adenovirus. Acyclovir is active against herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus but not adenovirus. Oseltamivir is a neuraminidase inhibitor active against influenza and has no activity against DNA viruses such as adenovirus.

Question 3

Which of the following antiviral agents is classified as having antiviral activity against human herpesvirus 6?

  • AFoscarnet
  • BRibavirin
  • COseltamivir
  • DAcyclovir

Correct Answer

A — Foscarnet

Rationale

Foscarnet is classified as having antiviral activity against human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), along with ganciclovir. Both agents are used clinically for HHV-6 disease. Ribavirin has no established antiviral activity against HHV-6. Oseltamivir is a neuraminidase inhibitor active only against influenza viruses. Acyclovir has insufficient activity against HHV-6B to be clinically useful, distinguishing HHV-6 from herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus where acyclovir is effective.

Question 4

Which of the following is classified as the oral prodrug of ganciclovir used for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients?

  • AValacyclovir
  • BBrincidofovir
  • CValganciclovir
  • DFamciclovir

Correct Answer

C — Valganciclovir

Rationale

Valganciclovir is the L-valyl ester oral prodrug of ganciclovir, classified as the standard oral agent for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. After oral absorption it is hydrolyzed to ganciclovir, achieving plasma concentrations comparable to intravenous ganciclovir. Valacyclovir is the prodrug of acyclovir. Brincidofovir is the lipid conjugate prodrug of cidofovir. Famciclovir is the prodrug of penciclovir, used for herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus infections.

Question 5

Which of the following is classified as an anti-alpha-4-integrin monoclonal antibody?

  • ARituximab
  • BPalivizumab
  • CNirsevimab
  • DNatalizumab

Correct Answer

D — Natalizumab

Rationale

Natalizumab is classified as an anti-alpha-4-integrin monoclonal antibody. Alpha-4-integrin is an adhesion molecule required for lymphocyte trafficking across the blood-brain barrier and gut endothelium; natalizumab blocks this migration and is used for relapsing multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease. Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Palivizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. Nirsevimab is a long-acting monoclonal antibody targeting a prefusion-specific epitope on the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein.

Question 6

Which of the following is classified as a lipid conjugate prodrug of cidofovir with broad deoxyribonucleic acid virus activity including adenovirus and substantially reduced nephrotoxicity compared with cidofovir?

  • AValganciclovir
  • BBrincidofovir
  • CValacyclovir
  • DFoscarnet

Correct Answer

B — Brincidofovir

Rationale

Brincidofovir is classified as a lipid conjugate prodrug of cidofovir. The lipid ether linkage allows intracellular delivery via lipid transport pathways, substantially reducing proximal tubular cidofovir accumulation and the severe nephrotoxicity that limits cidofovir clinical use. Brincidofovir retains cidofovir's broad deoxyribonucleic acid virus activity including adenovirus, BK polyomavirus, cytomegalovirus, and orthopoxviruses. Valganciclovir is the L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir. Valacyclovir is the L-valyl ester prodrug of acyclovir. Foscarnet is a pyrophosphate analogue, not a prodrug of cidofovir.

Core Pharmacology  ·  Questions 7–14

Apply your understanding of drug mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects. Each question requires one reasoning step.

Question 7

An immunocompromised patient presents with profuse bloody diarrhea and tenesmus. Cytomegalovirus colitis is suspected but the peripheral blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction is undetectable. Which of the following best explains why a negative blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction does not exclude cytomegalovirus colitis in this patient?

  • AIn cytomegalovirus colitis, the virus replicates locally within the colonic mucosal epithelium without generating sufficient systemic viremia to be detected in peripheral blood; colonoscopy with biopsy is required to establish the diagnosis
  • BBlood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction in this setting is inhibited by gastrointestinal inflammatory mediators that circulate in the bloodstream during active colitis
  • CCytomegalovirus colitis is caused by a distinct cytomegalovirus strain that lacks the gene sequences targeted by standard polymerase chain reaction assays
  • DBlood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction can only detect cytomegalovirus in patients with CD4 counts below 50 cells per cubic millimeter; at higher CD4 counts the assay lacks sensitivity for all cytomegalovirus manifestations

Correct Answer

A — In cytomegalovirus colitis, the virus replicates locally within the colonic mucosal epithelium without generating sufficient systemic viremia to be detected in peripheral blood; colonoscopy with biopsy is required to establish the diagnosis

Rationale

Cytomegalovirus colitis is a local end-organ manifestation in which the virus replicates within colonic mucosal epithelial cells and lamina propria macrophages. In many patients with isolated gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease, this local replication does not produce systemic viremia at levels detectable by peripheral blood polymerase chain reaction. Diagnosis therefore requires colonoscopy with biopsy demonstrating the characteristic cytomegalovirus cytopathic effect — enlarged cells with intranuclear and intracytoplasmic inclusions — confirmed by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Treatment of confirmed cytomegalovirus colitis is intravenous ganciclovir. Reliance on blood polymerase chain reaction alone would result in missed diagnoses and delayed treatment in this population.

Question 8

The standard of care for cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients combines intravenous ganciclovir with intravenous immunoglobulin, based on retrospective data showing survival benefit over ganciclovir alone. Which of the following best explains why intravenous immunoglobulin is added to an antiviral regimen?

  • AIntravenous immunoglobulin directly inhibits cytomegalovirus replication in alveolar macrophages through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complementing ganciclovir's polymerase inhibition
  • BIntravenous immunoglobulin raises ganciclovir plasma concentrations by inhibiting its renal elimination, producing higher antiviral drug levels at the site of pulmonary infection
  • CCytomegalovirus pneumonitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients involves an immune-mediated inflammatory component; intravenous immunoglobulin provides immunomodulatory benefit beyond direct antiviral activity, which ganciclovir alone cannot address
  • DIntravenous immunoglobulin prevents ganciclovir resistance by binding to cytomegalovirus particles in the airspace, blocking the UL97 enzyme from interacting with ganciclovir and selecting resistant variants

Correct Answer

C — Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients involves an immune-mediated inflammatory component; intravenous immunoglobulin provides immunomodulatory benefit beyond direct antiviral activity, which ganciclovir alone cannot address

Rationale

Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients is partly a virally driven and partly an immune-mediated inflammatory process. The high mortality (30 to 50 percent despite treatment) reflects not only the viral infection but also the exuberant immune response in the lung during immune reconstitution. Intravenous immunoglobulin provides immunomodulatory effects — including neutralizing inflammatory mediators, modulating complement, and potentially providing passive anti-cytomegalovirus antibody — that address the immune-mediated component of lung injury. This is distinct from the direct antiviral mechanism of ganciclovir, which suppresses viral replication but cannot modulate the inflammatory injury. The survival benefit of adding intravenous immunoglobulin to ganciclovir is based on retrospective cohort data rather than randomized controlled trial evidence.

Question 9

Rituximab is used both pre-emptively and therapeutically for Epstein-Barr virus-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Which of the following best explains why an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody is effective against this complication?

  • ARituximab inhibits Epstein-Barr virus replication by blocking the viral deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase expressed on the surface of infected B cells, reducing viral load and preventing lymphoproliferation
  • BRituximab restores the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte surveillance that calcineurin inhibitors suppressed, allowing the host immune system to eliminate Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells directly
  • CRituximab inhibits calcineurin, reversing the immunosuppression that allowed Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells to proliferate in the first place
  • DPost-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is driven by unconstrained proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells; rituximab depletes CD20-positive B lymphocytes including Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells, eliminating the proliferating population

Correct Answer

D — Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is driven by unconstrained proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells; rituximab depletes CD20-positive B lymphocytes including Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells, eliminating the proliferating population

Rationale

In immunocompetent individuals, Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes maintain tight surveillance over latently infected B cells. Transplant-related T-cell immunosuppression — calcineurin inhibitors, anti-thymocyte globulin, T-cell depletion — removes this surveillance, allowing Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells to proliferate uncontrolled. Because Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells express CD20, rituximab's anti-CD20 mechanism directly depletes this proliferating population. This is not an antiviral mechanism — rituximab does not inhibit Epstein-Barr virus replication — but a cellular depletion strategy targeting the cell type that Epstein-Barr virus exploits. Rituximab does not restore T-cell function or inhibit calcineurin.

Question 10

A kidney transplant recipient develops BK polyomavirus nephropathy confirmed by biopsy. The treating physician plans to reduce calcineurin inhibitor doses rather than initiating antiviral therapy as the primary intervention. Which of the following best explains this management approach?

  • ACalcineurin inhibitors directly activate BK polyomavirus replication by binding to the viral large T antigen; reducing their dose suppresses viral replication through a direct pharmacological mechanism
  • BNo antiviral has demonstrated robust efficacy for BK polyomavirus nephropathy; reducing immunosuppression allows partial recovery of antiviral T-cell immunity that can control BK polyomavirus replication more effectively than available drugs
  • CAntiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus nephropathy must be deferred until immunosuppression is reduced first, because antiviral drugs require intact T-cell function for their intracellular activation step
  • DCidofovir, the standard antiviral for BK polyomavirus, is nephrotoxic and therefore contraindicated in kidney transplant recipients; immunosuppression reduction is chosen as the only remaining non-nephrotoxic option

Correct Answer

B — No antiviral has demonstrated robust efficacy for BK polyomavirus nephropathy; reducing immunosuppression allows partial recovery of antiviral T-cell immunity that can control BK polyomavirus replication more effectively than available drugs

Rationale

BK polyomavirus nephropathy has no antiviral agent with proven efficacy in prospective randomized trials. Cidofovir and leflunomide have been used empirically but without strong evidence of clinical benefit. The primary and most effective intervention is reduction of immunosuppression — typically by lowering calcineurin inhibitor target levels — which allows partial recovery of BK polyomavirus-specific T-cell immunity. This immune recovery can control viral replication more effectively than any currently available drug. The risk of this approach is increased rejection, which must be balanced against the risk of progressive nephropathy. Option D is inaccurate because cidofovir is used for BK polyomavirus in some centers despite nephrotoxicity concerns; the main reason for not using it routinely is lack of proven efficacy, not absolute contraindication.

Question 11

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is caused by JC polyomavirus reactivation in oligodendrocytes and currently has no licensed antiviral therapy of proven benefit. Which of the following best explains why antivirals have failed to improve outcomes in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and what intervention is associated with improved survival?

  • AJC polyomavirus lacks the viral enzymes required for activation of currently available antivirals; immune reconstitution through antiretroviral therapy in HIV or immunosuppression reduction in other settings is the only intervention consistently associated with improved outcomes
  • BAntivirals cannot cross the blood-brain barrier in sufficient concentrations to reach JC polyomavirus in oligodendrocytes; intrathecal antiviral therapy is the only approach with activity against progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
  • CJC polyomavirus has developed resistance to all available antivirals through horizontal gene transfer from other polyomaviruses circulating in the immunocompromised host
  • DAntiviral therapy in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy paradoxically accelerates demyelination by triggering oligodendrocyte apoptosis through off-target nucleotide analogue incorporation into mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid

Correct Answer

A — JC polyomavirus lacks the viral enzymes required for activation of currently available antivirals; immune reconstitution through antiretroviral therapy in HIV or immunosuppression reduction in other settings is the only intervention consistently associated with improved outcomes

Rationale

JC polyomavirus does not encode a thymidine kinase or UL97 equivalent, making it intrinsically resistant to acyclovir and ganciclovir. Cidofovir — which does not require viral enzyme activation — has in vitro activity against JC polyomavirus but has not demonstrated clinical benefit in controlled studies. Cytarabine and mirtazapine have also been tested without meaningful benefit. The only intervention consistently associated with improved outcomes in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is immune reconstitution: in HIV-associated PML, optimizing antiretroviral therapy to suppress HIV and raise the CD4 count above 200 cells per cubic millimeter is the cornerstone of management; in non-HIV settings, reduction of immunosuppression when clinically feasible allows recovery of JC polyomavirus-specific T-cell immunity.

Question 12

An allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient is found to have a very high and stable HHV-6 deoxyribonucleic acid level on serial blood polymerase chain reaction testing, present at approximately 1 copy per cell. The transplant physician considers chromosomally integrated HHV-6. Which of the following best explains this finding and its clinical significance?

  • AVery high HHV-6 polymerase chain reaction levels always indicate severe active HHV-6 disease requiring immediate foscarnet therapy; the chromosomally integrated HHV-6 diagnosis cannot be made without viral culture
  • BA high stable HHV-6 level reflects reactivation from latency in CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells and always requires antiviral suppression to prevent encephalitis
  • CChromosomally integrated HHV-6 represents the full viral genome integrated into the germline of every nucleated cell; the very high stable polymerase chain reaction signal reflects germline deoxyribonucleic acid amplification rather than active viral replication, and antiviral therapy is not indicated
  • DVery high stable HHV-6 levels indicate ganciclovir resistance, because ganciclovir-susceptible strains are suppressed by valganciclovir prophylaxis given post-transplant while resistant strains accumulate

Correct Answer

C — Chromosomally integrated HHV-6 represents the full viral genome integrated into the germline of every nucleated cell; the very high stable polymerase chain reaction signal reflects germline deoxyribonucleic acid amplification rather than active viral replication, and antiviral therapy is not indicated

Rationale

In approximately 1 percent of the general population, the complete HHV-6 genome integrates into human germline chromosomes — chromosomally integrated HHV-6. Because every nucleated cell in the body contains a copy of this integrated genome, quantitative polymerase chain reaction testing of whole blood detects approximately 1 viral copy per host cell, producing very high and stable HHV-6 levels that can be mistaken for active replication. Chromosomally integrated HHV-6 is not associated with active viral disease and does not require antiviral therapy. Distinguishing chromosomally integrated HHV-6 from true active HHV-6 reactivation — which produces rising rather than stable viral loads — is essential to avoid inappropriate foscarnet therapy with its serious nephrotoxicity.

Question 13

An allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient develops new-onset seizures, anterograde amnesia, and confusion three weeks post-transplant. MRI shows bilateral T2-hyperintense signal abnormalities in the hippocampi and limbic structures. Which of the following best identifies the most likely opportunistic viral etiology, the preferred diagnostic test, and the appropriate antiviral treatment?

  • ACytomegalovirus encephalitis; blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction; intravenous ganciclovir
  • BHerpes simplex virus encephalitis; cerebrospinal fluid herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction; high-dose intravenous acyclovir
  • CJC polyomavirus progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; cerebrospinal fluid JC polyomavirus polymerase chain reaction; cidofovir
  • DHHV-6B encephalitis; cerebrospinal fluid HHV-6 polymerase chain reaction; intravenous foscarnet

Correct Answer

D — HHV-6B encephalitis; cerebrospinal fluid HHV-6 polymerase chain reaction; intravenous foscarnet

Rationale

HHV-6B encephalitis is the classic opportunistic viral encephalitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients during the first month post-transplant. Its distinctive clinical syndrome — seizures, anterograde amnesia, confusion, and bilateral hippocampal and limbic MRI T2 signal abnormalities — closely resembles autoimmune limbic encephalitis and should prompt immediate cerebrospinal fluid HHV-6 polymerase chain reaction in any HSCT recipient presenting with this pattern. Treatment is intravenous foscarnet for 3 to 6 weeks. Cytomegalovirus encephalitis typically produces periventricular rather than hippocampal changes. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis can affect the temporal lobes but is less common in this specific HSCT context and timing. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy produces subcortical white matter lesions without the bilateral hippocampal pattern described.

Question 14

Natalizumab, used for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy caused by JC polyomavirus reactivation. Which of the following best explains the pharmacological mechanism linking natalizumab to this risk?

  • ANatalizumab inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation, impairing myelin repair and leaving the central nervous system more vulnerable to JC polyomavirus-mediated demyelination
  • BNatalizumab blocks alpha-4-integrin, preventing lymphocyte trafficking into the central nervous system and thereby removing the immune surveillance that normally contains JC polyomavirus in the brain
  • CNatalizumab directly activates JC polyomavirus replication in the kidneys by binding to the viral capsid protein VP1, triggering productive infection and systemic spread to the brain
  • DNatalizumab depletes peripheral B lymphocytes that normally produce anti-JC polyomavirus antibodies, reducing the humoral immunity that contains JC polyomavirus in the bloodstream

Correct Answer

B — Natalizumab blocks alpha-4-integrin, preventing lymphocyte trafficking into the central nervous system and thereby removing the immune surveillance that normally contains JC polyomavirus in the brain

Rationale

Natalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks alpha-4-integrin, an adhesion molecule required for lymphocyte migration across the blood-brain barrier. By preventing lymphocyte entry into the central nervous system, natalizumab depletes the JC polyomavirus-specific T-cell surveillance that normally constrains JC polyomavirus replication in oligodendrocytes. With immune surveillance removed, JC polyomavirus — which is present latently in the kidneys, bone marrow, and lymphoid tissue of most adults — can reach and productively infect oligodendrocytes. Management of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy centers on drug cessation to allow lymphocyte re-entry into the central nervous system and immune reconstitution, while monitoring for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, which can itself cause neurological deterioration.

Clinical Correlations  ·  Questions 15–18

Apply pharmacological knowledge to clinical scenarios. Each vignette presents a patient situation; the question tests mechanism of action or drug selection.

Question 15

A hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient two months post-transplant develops profuse watery diarrhea with cramping and tenesmus. Peripheral blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction returns undetectable. The physician considers cytomegalovirus colitis but a colleague suggests that a negative blood polymerase chain reaction excludes the diagnosis. Which of the following best addresses this clinical reasoning?

  • AA negative blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction reliably excludes cytomegalovirus colitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients; empirical ganciclovir should be given while awaiting an alternative diagnosis
  • BBlood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction sensitivity for colitis in this population is below 20%; a stool cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction has higher sensitivity and should be ordered before proceeding to colonoscopy
  • CA negative blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction does not exclude cytomegalovirus colitis because local colonic mucosal replication frequently does not produce detectable systemic viremia; colonoscopy with biopsy is required to diagnose or exclude the condition
  • DCytomegalovirus colitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients always produces detectable blood viremia; the undetectable polymerase chain reaction confirms this is not cytomegalovirus and empirical antiviral therapy is inappropriate

Correct Answer

C — A negative blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction does not exclude cytomegalovirus colitis because local colonic mucosal replication frequently does not produce detectable systemic viremia; colonoscopy with biopsy is required to diagnose or exclude the condition

Rationale

Cytomegalovirus colitis is a local end-organ manifestation in which viral replication within colonic mucosal epithelial cells and lamina propria may not generate sufficient viremia for detection in peripheral blood. Blood cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction is frequently undetectable or low-level in isolated gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease, making it an unreliable tool for ruling out this diagnosis. Colonoscopy with mucosal biopsy demonstrating cytomegalovirus cytopathic effect confirmed by immunohistochemistry is the diagnostic standard. Relying on a negative blood polymerase chain reaction to exclude cytomegalovirus colitis in an immunocompromised patient with compatible symptoms risks delayed diagnosis and missed treatment with intravenous ganciclovir.

Question 16

A kidney transplant recipient at four months post-transplant is found to have a plasma BK polyomavirus viral load of 18,000 copies per milliliter on routine surveillance. She has no clinical symptoms and her allograft function is stable. Which of the following best describes the appropriate first-line management and its pharmacological basis?

  • AReduce immunosuppression, because no antiviral has proven efficacy for BK polyomavirus nephropathy and allowing partial recovery of antiviral T-cell immunity is the most effective approach to controlling viral replication
  • BInitiate intravenous cidofovir immediately, because cidofovir's virus-independent mechanism makes it active against all polyomaviruses including BK polyomavirus and this plasma level indicates imminent nephropathy
  • CStart oral valganciclovir prophylaxis, because BK polyomavirus shares the UL97 activation pathway with cytomegalovirus and ganciclovir triphosphate inhibits both viruses at therapeutic doses
  • DIncrease calcineurin inhibitor doses to prevent the inflammatory nephropathy that BK polyomavirus triggers; antiviral therapy should be withheld until nephropathy is confirmed by biopsy

Correct Answer

A — Reduce immunosuppression, because no antiviral has proven efficacy for BK polyomavirus nephropathy and allowing partial recovery of antiviral T-cell immunity is the most effective approach to controlling viral replication

Rationale

A plasma BK polyomavirus viral load above 10,000 copies per milliliter is the threshold used in most transplant programs to trigger intervention before nephropathy is established by biopsy. The primary intervention is reduction of immunosuppression — typically by lowering calcineurin inhibitor trough targets — which allows partial recovery of BK polyomavirus-specific T-cell immunity. No antiviral agent has demonstrated robust efficacy in prospective randomized trials for this indication. Increasing immunosuppression would worsen viral replication. Valganciclovir has no activity against BK polyomavirus because BK polyomavirus does not encode UL97 or a thymidine kinase equivalent to activate ganciclovir. While cidofovir has in vitro activity against BK polyomavirus, it lacks proven clinical efficacy and carries nephrotoxicity risk that is particularly problematic in this patient population.

Question 17

An allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient who received T-cell-depleted graft and anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning is found to have a rising Epstein-Barr virus viral load on serial surveillance testing, now above the center-specific threshold for pre-emptive intervention. Imaging shows no lymphadenopathy or mass lesions. Which of the following best describes the appropriate pharmacological intervention and its rationale?

  • AInitiate ganciclovir, because Epstein-Barr virus encodes a viral thymidine kinase that phosphorylates ganciclovir to its active form and reduces viral replication in B lymphocytes
  • BIncrease calcineurin inhibitor doses to suppress the immune activation driving Epstein-Barr virus replication; antiviral therapy should be deferred until post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is biopsy-confirmed
  • CInitiate foscarnet, because its phosphonoformate mechanism directly inhibits the Epstein-Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase that drives B-cell transformation and viral load rise
  • DAdminister pre-emptive rituximab, because Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells express CD20 and rituximab depletion of this population can prevent post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder from developing in patients with rising viremia

Correct Answer

D — Administer pre-emptive rituximab, because Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells express CD20 and rituximab depletion of this population can prevent post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder from developing in patients with rising viremia

Rationale

Rising Epstein-Barr virus viral load in a high-risk hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient — particularly those who received T-cell-depleted grafts or anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning — is an indication for pre-emptive rituximab before frank post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder develops. Epstein-Barr virus establishes latency in B cells, and the CD20 antigen is expressed on Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells. Rituximab depletion of this population controls the unconstrained B-cell proliferation that would otherwise progress to lymphoma. Antiviral agents such as ganciclovir, foscarnet, and acyclovir have no meaningful role in Epstein-Barr virus-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder because Epstein-Barr virus in latently infected B cells does not rely on viral deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase activity that these drugs target. Increasing immunosuppression would worsen Epstein-Barr virus replication.

Question 18

A 41-year-old man with HIV infection and a CD4 count of 30 cells per cubic millimeter is diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy based on clinical presentation and cerebrospinal fluid JC polyomavirus polymerase chain reaction. He is not currently on antiretroviral therapy. Which of the following best describes the appropriate management approach?

  • AInitiate intravenous cidofovir immediately, because its virus-independent mechanism makes it the only antiviral with in vitro activity against JC polyomavirus and early treatment prevents further demyelination
  • BInitiate antiretroviral therapy promptly to suppress HIV and restore CD4 count, because immune reconstitution is the only intervention consistently associated with improved outcomes in HIV-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; monitor for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
  • CDefer antiretroviral therapy until progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is controlled, because immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome worsens progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in all patients and the risk outweighs the benefit of viral suppression
  • DInitiate mirtazapine and cytarabine in combination, based on case series data showing synergistic inhibition of JC polyomavirus replication in oligodendrocytes by these two agents

Correct Answer

B — Initiate antiretroviral therapy promptly to suppress HIV and restore CD4 count, because immune reconstitution is the only intervention consistently associated with improved outcomes in HIV-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; monitor for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Rationale

In HIV-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, prompt initiation or optimization of antiretroviral therapy to suppress HIV replication and restore CD4 count above 200 cells per cubic millimeter is the only intervention consistently associated with improved neurological outcomes and survival. No antiviral agent — including cidofovir, cytarabine, or mirtazapine — has demonstrated clinical benefit in controlled studies for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome occurs in 10 to 30 percent of patients initiating antiretroviral therapy with active progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, producing transient neurological deterioration as immune function recovers, but this risk does not outweigh the benefit of antiretroviral therapy. Deferring antiretroviral therapy in a patient with CD4 of 30 would leave progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy without any effective intervention.