CHAPTER 1 ยท GENERAL PRINCIPLES

Section 1

What Is Pharmacology

The scope of the discipline and the two foundational frameworks that organize all drug-body interactions

Pharmacology is the science of drugs — how they are derived, what they do to the body, and what the body does to them. Every clinical decision involving a medication rests on pharmacological principles, whether or not the prescriber is consciously applying them. A working understanding of pharmacology begins with two foundational subdivisions that together explain every drug’s behavior in a patient.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacokinetics describes what the body does to a drug. Once a drug enters the body, it is subject to four processes — absorption into the circulation, distribution to tissues, metabolism by enzymes, and elimination by the kidneys or other routes. These four processes, taken together, determine how much drug reaches its target site, how quickly it gets there, and how long it stays. A drug that is poorly absorbed or rapidly metabolized may never achieve a therapeutic concentration regardless of how potent its molecular effect might be.

Pharmacodynamics describes what the drug does to the body. It covers the biochemical and physiological effects that result when a drug interacts with its molecular target — a receptor, enzyme, ion channel, or transporter — and the relationship between drug concentration at the target and the magnitude of the resulting effect. A drug with a powerful pharmacodynamic profile is clinically useless if its pharmacokinetics prevent it from reaching its target at an adequate concentration.

The two frameworks are inseparable in practice. Every question about why a drug is not working, why it is causing toxicity, or how its dose should be adjusted in a patient with kidney disease is a question about pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or both. Thinking in these two frameworks gives clinicians a structured approach to drug problems that applies across every drug class.

Pharmacogenomics

Pharmacogenomics examines how inherited genetic differences influence a patient’s response to drugs. Genetic variation can affect pharmacokinetics — for example, differences in the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes cause some patients to break down a drug very slowly while others clear it rapidly. Genetic variation can also affect pharmacodynamics, when the receptor or signaling molecule that a drug acts on differs structurally between individuals. In both cases, the result is that the same dose of the same drug produces very different effects in different patients. Clinically relevant examples include the enzyme that metabolizes codeine, warfarin, and clopidogrel, where genetic testing can now guide prescribing decisions.

Toxicology and the Therapeutic Index

Toxicology is the study of the harmful effects of chemical substances, including drugs at supratherapeutic doses or in vulnerable patients. The boundary between a therapeutic drug and a poison is largely a matter of dose and context. This dose-dependency is captured by the therapeutic index: the ratio of the dose that produces toxicity to the dose that produces the desired therapeutic effect. A drug with a narrow therapeutic index — where the toxic dose is close to the effective dose — requires careful monitoring and dose individualization. Digoxin, warfarin, and lithium are classic narrow-therapeutic-index drugs that demand this level of attention in clinical practice.

The Two Questions That Frame Every Drug Problem

Every clinical question about a drug is either a pharmacokinetics question or a pharmacodynamics question. Is enough drug reaching the target site? Is it being cleared too rapidly? Those are pharmacokinetics questions. Is the drug producing the intended effect at the receptor? Is the receptor responding normally? Those are pharmacodynamics questions. Separating the two provides a systematic approach to drug failure, unexpected toxicity, and dose adjustment that works across all drug classes.


Section 2

Drug Nomenclature and Sources

The three-name system, how generic names encode drug class, and the four origins of therapeutic agents

Every drug in clinical use carries at least three distinct names, each serving a different purpose. Recognizing this naming system is not a formality — it directly affects safe prescribing, the ability to recognize drug classes from unfamiliar names, and communication across clinical settings.

The Three-Name System

The chemical name specifies the exact molecular structure of a drug using systematic rules. Chemical names are precise but unwieldy for clinical use — the chemical name for acetaminophen is N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetamide — and they appear primarily in pharmaceutical chemistry, not at the bedside.

The generic name, also called the nonproprietary name, is the standardized publicly owned name assigned to an active ingredient. The World Health Organization coordinates an international system of generic names called International Nonproprietary Names. These names are organized by drug class using stems: a shared suffix or prefix that signals membership in a pharmacological class. Learning the common stems allows immediate class recognition from a drug name alone, even for an unfamiliar agent. Prescribing by generic name is standard practice in most institutional settings.

The brand name is assigned by the manufacturer and protected by trademark. A single generic drug may have several brand names across different manufacturers. Once the original patent expires, other manufacturers may produce and sell the same active ingredient as a generic product approved on the basis of bioequivalence, meaning it delivers the same amount of drug to the circulation in the same time frame as the reference product.

Key International Nonproprietary Name Stems to Recognize

The following stems appear on Step 1 pharmacology and in everyday prescribing. Knowing them allows class identification from the drug name alone: -olol (beta-adrenergic blockers: metoprolol, propranolol); -pril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: lisinopril, enalapril); -sartan (angiotensin II receptor blockers: losartan, valsartan); -statin (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors: atorvastatin, simvastatin); -prazole (proton pump inhibitors: omeprazole, pantoprazole); -mab (monoclonal antibodies: rituximab, trastuzumab); -nib (small-molecule kinase inhibitors: imatinib, erlotinib); -floxacin (fluoroquinolone antibiotics: ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin); -cycline (tetracycline class antibiotics: doxycycline, minocycline).

Sources of Drugs

Drugs are derived from four principal sources, each with characteristic examples that appear throughout pharmacology.

Source Type 1

Natural Sources

  • Plants, animals, and microorganisms
  • Morphine from the opium poppy
  • Digoxin from the foxglove plant
  • Penicillin from Penicillium molds

Source Type 2

Synthetic Drugs

  • Manufactured entirely by chemical synthesis
  • No natural precursor required
  • Most modern small-molecule drugs
  • Designed for specific molecular targets

Source Type 3

Semisynthetic Drugs

  • Natural compound modified chemically
  • Improves potency, selectivity, or stability
  • Ampicillin modified from penicillin
  • Oxycodone and hydrocodone from thebaine

Source Type 4

Biologic Drugs

  • Large molecules from living cell systems
  • Produced using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid technology
  • Monoclonal antibodies, recombinant insulin, vaccines
  • Structurally complex; distinct regulatory pathway

Section 3

Drug Development and Regulatory Pathways

The sequence from laboratory molecule to approved drug, and why most candidates never reach patients

The path from a drug candidate to an approved medication is long, regulated at every step, and ends in failure for the majority of compounds that enter it. Understanding this sequence helps clinicians interpret the evidence behind approved drugs and appreciate why newly approved medications may carry uncertainty about their long-term effects.

Preclinical Development

Before any drug is tested in humans, it undergoes preclinical evaluation: laboratory studies of its mechanism and cellular effects, followed by pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies in animals. These studies establish whether the compound is safe enough to justify exposing humans to it, identify the likely starting dose for first-in-human studies, and predict the expected toxicity profile. When preclinical data are sufficient, the drug sponsor submits an Investigational New Drug application to the Food and Drug Administration. Approval of the Investigational New Drug application is required before human testing can begin. Despite rigorous preclinical evaluation, approximately 90 percent of drugs that enter clinical testing do not ultimately receive approval, most often because of inadequate efficacy or unacceptable toxicity that only becomes apparent in humans.

Clinical Trial Phases

Clinical development is organized into four phases, each with distinct objectives and progressively larger patient populations.

First Human Testing

Phase I

  • Typically 20–100 healthy volunteers
  • Asks: Is the drug safe at increasing doses?
  • Establishes pharmacokinetic profile and maximum tolerated dose
  • Not designed to test efficacy

Preliminary Efficacy

Phase II

  • Typically 100–500 patients with the target condition
  • Asks: Does the drug show evidence of working?
  • Refines dosing and characterizes safety in patients
  • Most drugs fail here

Pivotal Trials

Phase III

  • Hundreds to thousands of patients
  • Asks: Does the drug work better than the comparator?
  • Large randomized controlled trials with pre-specified endpoints
  • Food and Drug Administration typically requires two adequate trials

Post-Approval Surveillance

Phase IV

  • Studies conducted after approval
  • Detects rare adverse effects not visible in Phase III
  • Characterizes safety in populations excluded from trials
  • Can lead to label changes or, rarely, market withdrawal
Approval Submissions

When Phase III trials demonstrate substantial evidence of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, the sponsor submits an approval application to the Food and Drug Administration. For small-molecule drugs this is a New Drug Application; for biologic drugs it is a Biologics License Application. The Food and Drug Administration reviews the full clinical and preclinical dataset before granting approval. Accelerated pathways exist for drugs addressing serious conditions with unmet medical need, allowing approval based on a surrogate endpoint that is likely to predict clinical benefit, with confirmatory trials required after approval.

Why Phase IV Matters Clinically

Phase III trials, however large, cannot detect adverse effects that occur in fewer than one in several thousand patients, nor can they detect risks in populations excluded from trials — pregnant women, children, patients with multiple comorbidities. Many of the most clinically consequential drug safety signals, including cardiovascular risks associated with certain anti-inflammatory drugs and bone effects of long-term bisphosphonate use, emerged from post-approval surveillance rather than pre-approval testing. Newly approved drugs carry real residual uncertainty about long-term safety.


Section 4

Routes of Administration

How the path a drug takes into the body determines its speed, completeness of absorption, and clinical applicability

The route of administration is a primary pharmacokinetic variable. It determines how much of a dose reaches the systemic circulation, how quickly it gets there, and therefore which clinical situations each route is suited for. Choosing the right route is not a detail — it is a prescribing decision with direct consequences for efficacy and patient safety.

Enteral Routes

Enteral routes deliver drug via the gastrointestinal tract. The oral route is the most common, most convenient, and most studied route of drug administration. Tablets and capsules dissolve in the stomach and small intestine, where drug molecules are absorbed across the intestinal wall into the portal circulation. Before reaching the systemic bloodstream, orally absorbed drugs pass through the liver, which can metabolize a substantial fraction of the absorbed dose before it ever reaches the target organ. This process is called the first-pass effect, and it reduces the fraction of the administered dose that reaches the systemic circulation — a quantity known as bioavailability. Drugs with extensive first-pass metabolism have low oral bioavailability and may need to be administered by a different route, or at much higher oral doses than they would require intravenously.

The sublingual route, where a tablet dissolves under the tongue, allows drug to be absorbed directly into the venous drainage of the mouth and bypass the liver entirely. Nitroglycerin is the prototypical sublingual drug: its first-pass metabolism is so extensive that it would be therapeutically ineffective given orally at standard doses, but it is highly effective sublingually because the liver does not see it before it reaches the coronary circulation.

Parenteral Routes

Parenteral routes bypass the gastrointestinal tract entirely. Intravenous administration delivers drug directly into the bloodstream, achieving 100 percent bioavailability by definition. This makes intravenous the preferred route when a rapid, predictable, and precisely controllable plasma concentration is required — in emergencies, in critically ill patients, and for drugs so poorly absorbed orally that the gastrointestinal route is not clinically viable.

Intramuscular injection deposits drug into muscle tissue, from which it diffuses into capillaries. Absorption is faster than oral but slower than intravenous, and bioavailability is generally high. Subcutaneous injection deposits drug into the tissue beneath the skin; absorption is slower still, which makes this route suitable for drugs intended to act over hours, such as insulin. Some formulations use this slow absorption deliberately to achieve depot effects, where drug is released gradually over days or weeks from the injection site.

Inhalation delivers drug directly to the pulmonary epithelium. The large surface area and rich blood supply of the lung allow rapid absorption, and topical delivery to the airway maximizes drug concentration at the target while minimizing systemic exposure. This makes inhalation the preferred route for bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Transdermal delivery through the skin provides sustained, slow release that avoids first-pass metabolism and maintains relatively constant plasma concentrations. Fentanyl patches for chronic pain and nicotine patches for cessation therapy are familiar examples.

Route Selection in Clinical Practice

The clinical rule is: match the route to the urgency and the drug’s pharmacokinetic properties. Oral is the default for chronic therapy in patients who can swallow and absorb reliably. Intravenous is the default for emergencies and for drugs that do not reach therapeutic concentrations orally. Inhalation is the default for drugs targeting the airway. Subcutaneous is the default for drugs requiring controlled absorption over hours, such as insulin. Transdermal is the default for drugs requiring 24-hour steady delivery without first-pass metabolism. Applying this logic — rather than memorizing each drug’s route in isolation — makes route selection a reasoning skill rather than a memory exercise.

Elements of Rational Prescribing

Route selection is one element of the broader rational prescribing framework. Rational prescribing means selecting the right drug, at the right dose, by the right route, for the right duration, in the right patient. Every component of this framework requires pharmacological reasoning. The right drug means choosing based on evidence of efficacy for a specific indication, not habit or familiarity. The right dose means individualizing based on the patient’s weight, renal function, hepatic function, age, and relevant genetic factors rather than applying a universal standard. The right route follows from the clinical urgency and the drug’s absorption properties. The right duration requires knowing how long a drug needs to be given to achieve its therapeutic goal and when continued use becomes net harmful. The right patient means assessing contraindications and considering all other medications the patient is taking, including non-prescription drugs and supplements, for potential interactions.


Suggested References
Author / Organization Title Source
Ritter JM, Flower R, Henderson G, Loke YK, MacEwan D, Rang HP Rang & Dale’s Pharmacology, 9th edition Elsevier, 2019
Relling MV, Evans WE Pharmacogenomics in the clinic Nature, 2015; 526(7573):343–350
Atkinson AJ Jr, Huang SM, Lertora JJL, Markey SP, eds Principles of Clinical Pharmacology, 3rd edition Academic Press, 2012
Serafini M, Cargnin S, Massarotti A, Tron GC, Pirali T, Genazzani AA What’s in a name? Drug nomenclature and medicinal chemistry trends using International Nonproprietary Name publications Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2021; 64(13):9297–9313
World Health Organization The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names for pharmaceutical substances WHO, 2013
Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs Nature Biotechnology, 2014; 32(1):40–51
Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Reboussin DM, Granger CB Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, 5th edition Springer, 2015
Waller DG, Sampson AP Medical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 5th edition Elsevier, 2018