Pharmacology2000
INTRODUCTION · MECHANISM OF ACTION · DIHYDROPYRIDINE CCBs IN ANGINA · NON-DIHYDROPYRIDINE CCBs IN ANGINA · COMBINATION STRATEGIES AND HAZARDOU · VASOSPASTIC ANGINA — CCBs AS DRUG O · MICROVASCULAR ANGINA — CCBs AND LIM · ADVERSE EFFECTS · CONTRAINDICATIONS · SUMMARY — SELECTING THE RIGHT CCB F · Infographic · References ↑ Top
Contents of this module
Section 1
INTRODUCTION

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) occupy a central position in antianginal pharmacotherapy, and uniquely among the major drug classes they carry a first-line indication across all three principal angina subtypes: stable exertional angina, vasospastic angina, and microvascular angina.3·4 Their anti-ischemic effects are mediated through two mechanistically distinct pathways: peripheral vasodilation reducing afterload, and direct coronary vasodilation increasing supply. The non-dihydropyridine subclass adds a third pathway through rate-limiting cardiac effects.11

Within the CCB class, the pharmacological divergence between dihydropyridines (DHPs) and non-dihydropyridines (non-DHPs) is clinically profound. They share the same molecular target, the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel, yet their tissue selectivity and hemodynamic profiles differ enough that they are effectively distinct drug classes in clinical practice, with different indications, combination rules, and contraindications.11

Section 2
MECHANISM OF ACTION
The L-Type Calcium Channel

Voltage-gated L-type calcium channels (Cav1.2) are the primary route of calcium entry into vascular smooth muscle cells, cardiac myocytes, SA node pacemaker cells, and AV node conduction cells.11 In vascular smooth muscle: membrane depolarization leads to L-type channel opening, Ca2+ influx, calmodulin activation, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylation, myosin-actin cross-bridge cycling, and contraction (vasoconstriction). CCB blockade reduces Ca2+ entry, reduces MLCK activity, causes smooth muscle relaxation, and produces vasodilation.11 In cardiac pacemaker and conduction tissue: Ca2+ entry drives phase 0 depolarization in SA and AV nodal cells (unlike ventricular myocytes where phase 0 is driven by fast Na+ channels). CCB blockade slows SA node automaticity (negative chronotropy), slows AV conduction (negative dromotropy), and reduces ventricular rate.11 In ventricular myocardium: Ca2+ entry triggers calcium-induced calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (CICR) and contraction. CCB blockade reduces the Ca2+ transient and reduces contractility (negative inotropy).11

Subclass Tissue Selectivity — The Critical Distinction

All CCBs block L-type channels, but they bind to different regions of the channel alpha-1 subunit with markedly different affinities for vascular versus cardiac tissue.11 Dihydropyridines (DHPs) have a vascular:cardiac selectivity ratio of approximately 10:1 to 30:1 (highly vascular-selective).11 Their primary effect is vascular smooth muscle relaxation producing peripheral vasodilation (afterload reduction) and coronary vasodilation. Cardiac effects are minimal at therapeutic doses (negligible chronotropy, dromotropy, or inotropy). The dominant clinical liability when used without beta-blockers is baroreceptor-mediated reflex tachycardia and sympathetic activation in response to the BP fall from peripheral vasodilation.3·4 Non-dihydropyridines (non-DHPs): verapamil (phenylalkylamine) has a vascular:cardiac selectivity ratio of approximately 1:1 (equal vascular and cardiac effects). Diltiazem (benzothiazepine) has a ratio of approximately 3:1 (intermediate; somewhat more vascular than cardiac).11 Primary effects of both include vasodilation AND cardiac rate/conduction slowing. Vasodilation tends to be offset by direct negative chronotropy; HR does not rise with non-DHPs and often HR falls.11

Section 3
DIHYDROPYRIDINE CCBs IN ANGINA
Pharmacological Profile — Amlodipine

Amlodipine is highly lipophilic and carries a positive charge at physiological pH, producing a slow on-rate and extremely slow off-rate from the DHP binding site on vascular smooth muscle.11 The results are: slow onset of vasodilation (minimizes reflex tachycardia compared to nifedipine IR); extremely long duration of action (intrinsic half-life ~35-50 hours; once-daily dosing achieves near-perfectly stable plasma levels); and gradual, sustained vasodilation without abrupt BP swings. Bioavailability: ~60-65%. Metabolism: hepatic (CYP3A4) to inactive metabolites. Dose range: 2.5-10 mg once daily.1·11 Anti-ischemic mechanisms include afterload reduction (peripheral arteriolar dilation reduces systolic wall stress and reduces myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2)); coronary vasodilation (dilates epicardial coronary arteries, particularly effective in vasospastic angina);5 and no reduction in HR at therapeutic doses; reflex tachycardia is blunted by amlodipine's slow onset but not abolished; beta-blocker co-therapy is the pharmacological solution.3·4 Evidence: the CAMELOT trial demonstrated that amlodipine 10 mg vs. placebo in patients with CAD and normal BP significantly reduced adverse cardiovascular outcomes and hospitalizations for angina.1 The PREVENT trial showed amlodipine reduced coronary events in CAD patients.3

Nifedipine immediate-release (IR) has a short half-life (~2 hours), rapid vasodilation, pronounced reflex tachycardia and sympathetic activation, and is associated with increased cardiovascular events in chronic use; it is CONTRAINDICATED for chronic angina management.11 The mechanism of harm requires understanding: rapid onset of vasodilation from nifedipine IR produces an abrupt fall in blood pressure within 15-30 minutes of ingestion.11 The baroreflex responds with intense sympathetic activation, producing reflex tachycardia (HR rise of 20-30 bpm is common), increased contractility, and catecholamine surge. Each of these responses increases myocardial oxygen demand substantially, negating and potentially reversing the anti-ischemic benefit of vasodilation. In addition, the catecholamine surge can destabilize coronary plaques and has been associated with acute myocardial infarction in case-control and observational studies of short-acting dihydropyridines.11 This reflex tachycardia and sympathetic activation does not occur with amlodipine because amlodipine's extremely slow onset (due to its slow channel on-rate and very long half-life of 35-50 hours) produces gradual, sustained vasodilation that does not trigger a baroreceptor-mediated response of clinical magnitude. When a beta-blocker is co-administered with nifedipine IR, reflex tachycardia is blocked, explaining the historical use of nifedipine IR plus propranolol, which was safer than nifedipine IR alone. However, this combination is no longer clinically appropriate because long-acting alternatives have fully supplanted it.11 Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS)/extended-release uses osmotic pump delivery for near-zero-order release, substantially reducing peak-trough fluctuation and reflex tachycardia. The ACTION trial established safety and reduced revascularization need in stable angina.2 Dose: 30-90 mg once daily.

Clinical Use of DHPs in Angina

In stable exertional angina, DHPs are first-line as monotherapy when beta-blockers are contraindicated or not tolerated,3·4 and are the preferred combination partner with beta-blockers when monotherapy is insufficient. The preferred agent is amlodipine 5-10 mg once daily (strongest evidence base; best tolerability).1·3 In vasospastic (Prinzmetal) angina, DHPs are first-line agents (ESC 2019 Class I).5 Direct coronary smooth muscle relaxation prevents and aborts epicardial spasm. Higher doses are often required: amlodipine up to 10 mg/day and nifedipine GITS up to 90 mg/day. Attack frequency is reduced by 70-90% in most patients.5 In microvascular angina, CCBs improve symptoms in approximately 40-50% of patients, with amlodipine preferred for tolerability and once-daily dosing.4 When beta-blockers are contraindicated by severe respiratory disease, DHPs have no bronchoconstrictive effect and are the preferred antianginal.3·4 In angina with peripheral arterial disease, DHPs are preferred over beta-blockers as peripheral vasodilation may improve limb perfusion.3·4

Section 4
NON-DIHYDROPYRIDINE CCBs IN ANGINA
Verapamil

Classification: phenylalkylamine; L-type CCB. Selectivity: approximately equal cardiac and vascular effects (1:1 ratio). Half-life: 6-8 hours (IR); ~12 hours (ER). Bioavailability: ~20-35% with significant first-pass hepatic metabolism via CYP3A4. Active metabolite: norverapamil (~20% activity of parent). Dose (angina): 80-120 mg three times daily (IR); 120-480 mg once daily (SR/ER).11 Hemodynamic profile: coronary and peripheral vasodilation; negative chronotropy (reduces HR 15-20% at therapeutic doses); negative dromotropy (slows AV nodal conduction, prolongs PR interval); negative inotropy (clinically significant; most pronounced in pre-existing LV dysfunction). Net result: no reflex tachycardia; HR falls or is unchanged; BP reduces modestly.11

Verapamil drug interactions: quantified clinical reference: Verapamil is both a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, producing clinically significant interactions across multiple drug classes.11 Digoxin: verapamil inhibits P-glycoprotein-mediated renal tubular secretion of digoxin and reduces its non-renal clearance, increasing digoxin plasma levels by 70-80%. The digoxin dose should be reduced by 30-50% when verapamil is introduced and levels re-checked within 7-14 days. Additive negative chronotropy and dromotropy further increase the risk of bradycardia and AV block at any given digoxin concentration.11 Statins: CYP3A4 (cytochrome P450 3A4) inhibition by verapamil substantially increases plasma concentrations of simvastatin (by approximately 2-3 fold) and lovastatin, raising myopathy and rhabdomyolysis risk. The simvastatin dose should be limited to 20 mg/day with concomitant verapamil or the statin switched to rosuvastatin, pravastatin, or fluvastatin, which are not significantly metabolized by CYP3A4.11 Beta-blockers: the combination of verapamil with any beta-blocker is CONTRAINDICATED due to additive and potentially synergistic depression of SA node automaticity and AV nodal conduction, risking severe bradycardia, complete AV block, and hemodynamic compromise. This contraindication extends to ophthalmic beta-blocker preparations (timolol eye drops) which have systemic absorption.3·4 Colchicine: verapamil inhibits both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, the two primary elimination pathways for colchicine, and can increase colchicine levels to toxic ranges producing myopathy, bone marrow suppression, and multi-organ failure; particularly dangerous in renal impairment where colchicine accumulation is already elevated.11 Cyclosporine: verapamil substantially increases cyclosporine plasma levels via CYP3A4 (cytochrome P450 3A4) inhibition, risking nephrotoxicity; transplant patients on cyclosporine require careful monitoring if verapamil is added. Dofetilide: verapamil inhibits renal organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2)-mediated secretion of dofetilide, raising dofetilide plasma levels and QTc; this combination is CONTRAINDICATED (included in the dofetilide prescribing information as an absolute contraindication).11 Ranolazine: verapamil moderately inhibits CYP3A4, increasing ranolazine levels by approximately 1.5-2.5 fold; ranolazine should be limited to 500 mg twice daily when prescribed with verapamil, and baseline and follow-up QTc monitoring is required.3 Constipation affects approximately 30% of patients on verapamil and is the most common reason for discontinuation, arising from inhibition of Ca2+-dependent smooth muscle contraction in the gut.11 Manage with dietary fiber and stool softeners; dose reduction if severe.

Diltiazem

Classification: benzothiazepine; L-type CCB. Selectivity: intermediate (3:1 vascular:cardiac), more vascular-selective than verapamil but with clinically meaningful cardiac rate-limiting effects. Half-life: 3-4 hours (IR); 5-7 hours (SR); once-daily ER formulations achieve 12-24 hour coverage. Bioavailability: ~40% with hepatic first-pass via CYP3A4. Dose (angina): 120-360 mg daily (divided or ER once daily).11 Hemodynamic profile: peripheral and coronary vasodilation; moderate negative chronotropy (less than verapamil); AV nodal slowing (prolongs PR interval, less than verapamil); mild negative inotropy (less pronounced than verapamil; generally safe in mild-moderate LV dysfunction with caution). Net result: HR reduction + vasodilation without reflex tachycardia.11 Clinical advantage: combines vasodilation AND HR reduction in a single agent, useful when a patient needs both effects but cannot tolerate beta-blockers.3·4 Better tolerated than verapamil in terms of constipation and negative inotropy.

Diltiazem drug interactions: quantified clinical reference: Diltiazem is a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor and a moderate P-glycoprotein inhibitor, producing a drug interaction profile qualitatively similar to verapamil but generally of lower magnitude.11 Digoxin: diltiazem increases digoxin levels by approximately 20-40% via combined effects on P-glycoprotein and renal clearance, less than verapamil but still clinically significant, particularly given the narrow therapeutic window of digoxin. Digoxin levels should be rechecked 7-14 days after adding diltiazem, and additive nodal effects monitored by ECG.11 Ranolazine: diltiazem's moderate CYP3A4 inhibition increases ranolazine plasma concentrations by approximately 1.5-2.5 fold. The maximum recommended ranolazine dose when co-administered with diltiazem is 500 mg twice daily (not the standard maximum of 1000 mg twice daily). QTc must be monitored at baseline and after uptitration.3 This is one of the most clinically relevant interactions in the angina context because ranolazine is frequently added to patients already on diltiazem as their rate-controlling agent. Ivabradine: both diltiazem and ivabradine reduce heart rate by distinct mechanisms (AV nodal calcium channel blockade versus sinus node If inhibition). Their combination produces additive and potentially unpredictable HR reduction. Diltiazem also inhibits CYP3A4, raising ivabradine plasma levels. If this combination is used, the resting HR must be monitored closely and doses adjusted to maintain HR above 50 bpm.3 Beta-blockers: CONTRAINDICATED in combination with diltiazem for the same reasons as verapamil; additive SA and AV nodal depression risks severe bradycardia and AV block. The relative contraindication is slightly less absolute than with verapamil because diltiazem's negative dromotropy is less pronounced, but the combination remains contraindicated in clinical practice.3·4 Statins: diltiazem increases simvastatin levels by approximately 2-4 fold via CYP3A4 inhibition, similar in magnitude to verapamil. Limit simvastatin to 20 mg/day or substitute a non-CYP3A4 statin.11 Cyclosporine: as with verapamil, diltiazem increases cyclosporine levels; transplant patients require monitoring. Carbamazepine: diltiazem increases carbamazepine levels substantially, risking neurotoxicity; this combination requires careful monitoring of carbamazepine plasma concentrations.11

Section 5
COMBINATION STRATEGIES AND HAZARDOUS COMBINATIONS
Beta-Blocker + dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCB) — Preferred Dual Therapy

The combination of a beta-blocker with a long-acting DHP-CCB (primarily amlodipine) is the most widely used evidence-based dual antianginal strategy.3·4 The beta-blocker contributes HR and contractility reduction, blocks the reflex tachycardia triggered by DHP-mediated vasodilation, and provides post-MI and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) cardioprotection. The DHP-CCB contributes peripheral vasodilation (afterload reduction), coronary vasodilation (supply enhancement), and does not add to AV conduction depression.3·4 The combined result is comprehensive MVO2 reduction (HR + contractility + afterload), enhanced coronary supply, no excessive bradycardia or AV block risk, and BP control as an additional benefit.3·4 The standard combination is metoprolol succinate ER 25-200 mg + amlodipine 5-10 mg once daily. ESC 2019 gives this combination a Class I, Level A recommendation for symptomatic stable angina inadequately controlled on monotherapy.3

Beta-Blocker + Non-DHP CCB — CONTRAINDICATED

Combining any beta-blocker with verapamil or diltiazem creates additive and potentially life-threatening cardiac conduction and contractility depression.3·4 The interaction is pharmacodynamic; it applies regardless of which specific BB or non-DHP CCB is used. Clinical risks include severe bradycardia, high-degree AV block (including complete heart block), and hemodynamic collapse from combined negative inotropy. IV verapamil administered to a patient on oral beta-blocker can cause sudden cardiac arrest.11 ABSOLUTE RULE: never combine in routine practice. Rare exceptions under specialist supervision require confirmed normal baseline conduction, preserved EF, and facility for emergency temporary pacing.3·4

CCB + Nitrate Combination

DHP-CCB + long-acting nitrate produces additive afterload and preload reduction with risk of significant hypotension, particularly in elderly or volume-depleted patients.4 A concurrent beta-blocker is required to control reflex tachycardia from both agents. This three-drug combination (BB + DHP-CCB + nitrate) is reserved for Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) III-IV patients on dual therapy.3·4 Non-DHP CCB + nitrate is a reasonable combination in vasospastic angina when CCB monotherapy is insufficient.5 HR is controlled by the non-DHP CCB, limiting reflex tachycardia from nitrate-induced vasodilation.5

Section 6
VASOSPASTIC ANGINA — CCBs AS DRUG OF CHOICE
Why CCBs Are First-Line in Vasospasm

Vasospastic angina is a disorder of abnormal coronary smooth muscle Ca2+-mediated reactivity.5 CCBs directly address this pathophysiology by blocking L-type Ca2+ channels in coronary smooth muscle, preventing and reversing spasm regardless of the vasoconstrictive trigger (endothelin, serotonin, alpha-adrenergic stimulation, cold, hyperventilation).5 Both DHP and non-DHP CCBs are effective (ESC 2019 Class I for CCBs in vasospastic angina).5 The effect is not dependent on endothelial function.5

Dosing Strategy in Vasospastic Angina

Higher CCB doses are typically required than for stable exertional angina:5 amlodipine 5-10 mg once daily (up to maximum); nifedipine GITS 60-90 mg once daily; diltiazem ER 240-360 mg once daily; verapamil ER 240-480 mg once daily. If attacks persist on maximal CCB monotherapy: add a long-acting nitrate (isosorbide mononitrate extended-release (ISMN-ER) or NTG patch); review and eliminate triggers; and reinforce smoking cessation (most important modifiable risk factor).5 Refractory vasospastic angina requires specialist referral; dual CCB therapy under supervision; and PCI for focal coronary spasm at stenosis sites in selected cases.5

Duration of Therapy

Vasospastic angina may remit spontaneously over months to years, particularly after smoking cessation.5 Annual reassessment with consideration for slow CCB dose reduction if attack-free for 6-12 months is reasonable; abrupt discontinuation risks rebound spasm.5

Section 7
MICROVASCULAR ANGINA — CCBs AND LIMITATIONS

CCBs provide partial benefit in microvascular angina (MVA), improving symptoms in approximately 40-50% of patients.4 Amlodipine has the most consistent evidence for symptom reduction in MVA.4 Non-DHP CCBs (diltiazem) have also been studied with modest benefit demonstrated.4 Effect on coronary flow reserve (CFR) is inconsistent; symptom improvement may not correlate with CFR improvement on functional testing.4 ESC 2019 guideline position: beta-blockers and CCBs are both recommended for MVA (Class IIa); ranolazine and ACE inhibitors are additional options.4 No single agent demonstrates clear superiority in MVA.4

Section 8
ADVERSE EFFECTS
Dihydropyridines — Adverse Effect Profile

Peripheral edema (ankle/pedal edema) is the most common DHP adverse effect, affecting 10-30% of patients at standard doses and up to 50% with amlodipine 10 mg.11 The mechanism is arteriolar dilation without proportionate venodilation, increasing capillary hydrostatic pressure and causing fluid transudation into the interstitium. It is NOT due to sodium retention or cardiac failure.11 Furosemide will worsen it by activating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Management options include dose reduction; adding an ACE inhibitor/ARB (venodilation balances arteriolar dilation); the ACCOMPLISH trial showed amlodipine + benazepril had less edema than amlodipine alone);8 leg elevation; and switching to lercanidipine where available. Reflex tachycardia is more pronounced with short-acting DHPs (nifedipine IR); minimized with amlodipine (slow onset/offset); and abolished by concurrent beta-blocker.3·4 Flushing and headache are vasodilatory symptoms, more common at initiation, usually resolving within 1-2 weeks, and more common with nifedipine than amlodipine.11 Gingival hyperplasia is a class effect of all CCBs, more common with nifedipine and verapamil than amlodipine, with risk increased with concurrent cyclosporine or phenytoin; manage with meticulous oral hygiene; may require gingivectomy in severe cases.11

Non-Dihydropyridines — Adverse Effect Profile

Bradycardia from SA node suppression may be profound at high doses or in combination with digoxin or beta-blockers. Monitor resting HR; target 55-65 bpm for angina.11 AV block: both verapamil and diltiazem prolong the PR interval. Risk of 2nd or 3rd degree AV block exists in combination with other AV-nodal agents or with pre-existing conduction disease. Baseline ECG is required and PR interval monitoring ongoing.11 Negative inotropy and heart failure risk: both verapamil and diltiazem are CONTRAINDICATED in HFrEF (EF <40%).6·11 The mechanism is reduced Ca2+ transient impairing contractility in a myocardium already relying on sympathetic upregulation. Amlodipine is safe in HFrEF (PRAISE-1; PREVENT).6·3 Constipation affects ~30% of verapamil patients due to inhibition of intestinal smooth muscle Ca2+-mediated contraction;11 diltiazem causes much less constipation. Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome + verapamil is CONTRAINDICATED: verapamil blocks the AV node but not the accessory pathway, potentially accelerating ventricular rate via the accessory pathway during AF and causing VF risk.11 CYP3A4 drug interactions (both non-DHPs) include digoxin toxicity, statin myopathy (avoid simvastatin >20 mg; use rosuvastatin or pravastatin), cyclosporine toxicity, colchicine toxicity, and interactions with midazolam/triazolam.11

Section 9
CONTRAINDICATIONS

Contraindications for DHPs include cardiogenic shock; severe aortic stenosis (vasodilation without ability to increase cardiac output causes hypotension);4 acute decompensated HF with pulmonary edema; and nifedipine IR in UA/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).4 Contraindications for non-DHPs (verapamil and diltiazem) include HFrEF (EF <40%) due to negative inotropy risk;6·11 2nd or 3rd degree AV block without pacemaker; sick sinus syndrome without pacemaker; concurrent beta-blocker use;3·4 WPW syndrome (verapamil);11 and severe LV dysfunction.

Section 10
SUMMARY — SELECTING THE RIGHT CCB FOR ANGINA

In stable exertional angina: first-line monotherapy when BB is contraindicated: amlodipine 5-10 mg once daily;3·4 first-line combination is amlodipine + beta-blocker;3·4 if rate control is also needed and BB is contraindicated: diltiazem ER or verapamil ER.3·4 In vasospastic angina: first-line (all subtypes) is any long-acting CCB;5 AVOID all beta-blockers.5 In microvascular angina: first-line is beta-blocker or CCB (amlodipine preferred);4 add-on options are ranolazine and ACE inhibitors.4 In angina with HFrEF (EF <40%): safe CCB is AMLODIPINE ONLY;6·11 AVOID verapamil and diltiazem.6·11 In angina with COPD/asthma when BB is contraindicated: preferred is amlodipine or diltiazem ER (if HR is also high).3·4 In angina with AF when rate control is needed: preferred is diltiazem ER or verapamil ER;4 AVOID combination with beta-blocker.3·4

Visual Summary
Infographic — ANG-04
A visual synthesis of this module’s key concepts
References
Selected References
  1. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Libby P, et al. Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study. JAMA. 2004;292(18):2217-2225

    doi:10.1001/jama.292.18.2217
  2. Poole-Wilson PA, Lubsen J, Kirwan BA, et al. Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial). Lancet. 2004;364(9437):849-857

    doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16980-8
  3. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-477

    doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
  4. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44-e164

    doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013
  5. Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(33):2565-2568

    doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv351
  6. Packer M, O'Connor CM, Ghali JK, et al. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure (PRAISE-1). N Engl J Med. 1996;335(15):1107-1114

    doi:10.1056/NEJM199610103351504
  7. Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events (PREVENT trial). Circulation. 2000;102(13):1503-1510

    doi:10.1161/01.CIR.102.13.1503
  8. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients (ACCOMPLISH). N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2417-2428

    doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0806182
  9. Crea F, Bairey Merz CN, Beltrame JF, et al. The parallel tales of microvascular angina and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(7):473-477

    doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw461
  10. Opie LH, Yusuf S, Kubler W. Current status of safety and efficacy of calcium channel blockers in cardiovascular diseases. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2000;43(2):171-196

    doi:10.1053/pcad.2000.7010
  11. Abernethy DR, Schwartz JB. Calcium-antagonist drugs. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(19):1447-1457

    doi:10.1056/NEJM199911043411907
Back to top