Hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) exist in a bidirectional, self-amplifying relationship. Hypertension causes CKD through hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and CKD perpetuates and worsens hypertension through sodium retention, RAAS activation, and sympathetic stimulation.
Approximately 80–85% of patients with CKD have hypertension, and hypertension is the second leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States after diabetes.1 The pharmacological management of hypertension in CKD is among the most consequential and nuanced clinical decisions in all of medicine: the choice of antihypertensive agent, the BP target pursued, and the monitoring approach employed each have measurable effects on the trajectory of renal function, proteinuria, and cardiovascular outcomes over years to decades.
CKD disrupts the normal pressure-natriuresis relationship: the kidney normally excretes excess sodium in response to rising blood pressure, thereby correcting BP. As nephron mass is lost, the surviving nephrons must compensate by increasing their individual filtration and excretory burden. This adaptation initially preserves sodium balance but at the cost of resetting the pressure-natriuresis curve to a higher operating point, meaning the kidney now defends a higher BP.2
Sodium and water retention occurs because reduced functioning nephron mass decreases total natriuretic capacity, while surviving nephrons have increased tubular sodium reabsorption. The result is volume expansion, increased cardiac preload, and elevated cardiac output, with volume-dependent hypertension predominating in advanced CKD. RAAS activation occurs as ischemic nephrons activate juxtaglomerular cells to release renin; in some forms of CKD, inappropriate renin secretion sustains angiotensin II levels even in the face of volume expansion, a failure of the normal suppression mechanism. Angiotensin II causes systemic vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, and further sodium retention, while aldosterone independently promotes inflammation, fibrosis, and further nephron loss through the aldosterone-escape phenomenon.
CKD also activates afferent renal nerves from ischemic and damaged kidney tissue, increasing efferent sympathetic outflow and raising cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance, with sympathetic activation further stimulating renin release. Uremic toxins impair endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production, oxidative stress quenches NO increasing vasoconstriction, and endothelin-1 upregulation contributes to sustained vasoconstriction. CKD-related anemia from reduced erythropoietin production causes compensatory increased cardiac output, contributing to systolic hypertension, and elevated parathyroid hormone levels increase intracellular calcium in vascular smooth muscle, contributing to vasoconstriction.
Intraglomerular hypertension, representing elevated pressure within the glomerular capillaries, is a critical mediator of progressive nephron loss. Even when systemic BP is controlled, intraglomerular pressure may remain elevated due to preferential dilation of the afferent arteriole relative to the efferent arteriole, hyperfiltration in surviving nephrons due to compensatory glomerular hypertrophy, and in early diabetic nephropathy, diabetes-related glomerular vasodilation.
Elevated intraglomerular pressure drives proteinuria, which is itself nephrotoxic through multiple mechanisms: filtered proteins activate tubular cells promoting inflammation and fibrosis; albumin carries fatty acids that are toxic to proximal tubular cells; protein casts obstruct tubular lumina; and complement activation within tubular fluid drives interstitial injury. This creates a self-amplifying cycle in which systemic hypertension leads to intraglomerular hypertension, which causes proteinuria, which drives tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis, leading to further nephron loss, which worsens systemic hypertension. Pharmacological intervention that specifically reduces intraglomerular pressure through RAAS inhibition interrupts this cycle more effectively than equivalent systemic BP reduction achieved by non-RAAS agents.
ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and ARBs confer renoprotection through mechanisms that are additive to and partially independent of their systemic antihypertensive effect.1,3 Angiotensin II preferentially constricts the efferent arteriole relative to the afferent arteriole, maintaining intraglomerular pressure. RAAS inhibition dilates the efferent arteriole, reducing intraglomerular hydrostatic pressure, which directly reduces proteinuria and slows glomerulosclerosis. Beyond reducing intraglomerular pressure, RAAS inhibitors reduce the permeability of the glomerular filtration barrier, and reduction in proteinuria correlates directly with slowing of CKD progression independent of BP change. Angiotensin II stimulates transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) production, a key driver of glomerular and interstitial fibrosis; RAAS inhibition reduces this TGF-beta-mediated fibrosis. Aldosterone independently activates fibrotic pathways, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy provides additional anti-fibrotic benefit. Reduced angiotensin II levels also decrease nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) activation, macrophage infiltration, and cytokine production within the renal interstitium.
In type 1 diabetic nephropathy, Lewis et al. (1993) compared captopril versus placebo in type 1 diabetes with proteinuria above 500 mg per day and creatinine of 2.5 mg/dL or below. Captopril reduced the risk of doubling of serum creatinine by 50% and the combined endpoint of death, dialysis, or transplantation by 50%, independent of BP effects.4
In type 2 diabetic nephropathy, the RENAAL trial (2001) compared losartan versus placebo in type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, finding that losartan reduced the primary composite endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death by 16%, and ESRD alone by 28%.5 The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT, 2001) compared irbesartan versus amlodipine versus placebo in type 2 diabetic nephropathy; irbesartan reduced the primary composite endpoint by 20% versus placebo and by 23% versus amlodipine, confirming renoprotection independent of BP reduction.6 In non-diabetic CKD, the REIN trial (1997) found that ramipril significantly reduced the rate of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline and the risk of reaching ESRD, with effects greatest in those with the highest baseline proteinuria.7
KDIGO 2021 Blood Pressure Guidelines recommend ACEi or ARB as first-line antihypertensive therapy for all patients with CKD and albuminuria above 30 mg/g (Category A evidence) and strongly recommend ACEi or ARB for CKD with albuminuria above 300 mg/g regardless of BP level.1 Routine combination of ACEi plus ARB (dual RAAS blockade) in CKD is not recommended, as the VA NEPHRON-D trial showed excess acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia without benefit.
A fall in proteinuria of more than 30% from baseline following RAAS inhibitor initiation predicts long-term renoprotection. This antiproteinuric response should be confirmed at 3 months after initiation and used to guide dose titration, with the goal of maximizing proteinuria reduction within tolerability limits. It should be interpreted in the context of concurrent dietary sodium reduction, since a high-sodium diet blunts the antiproteinuric response to RAAS inhibition.
A rise in serum creatinine of up to 30% following RAAS inhibitor initiation is expected, acceptable, and associated with long-term renoprotection. This rise reflects the intended reduction in intraglomerular pressure; the reduced GFR is the pharmacological goal, not an adverse effect.1 After initiation or dose increase, creatinine, eGFR, and potassium should be rechecked at 2–4 weeks. A rise of 30–50% warrants reassessment for contributing factors such as volume depletion, NSAIDs, or contrast exposure, and consideration of dose reduction. A rise above 50% or severe acute kidney injury (AKI) warrants withholding the drug, reassessing the indication, and restarting at a lower dose once the patient is stable.
Potassium monitoring is essential: hyperkalemia (potassium above 5.5 mEq/L) requires dose reduction or drug discontinuation. Potassium binders such as patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate may enable continuation of RAAS inhibition in patients with CKD-related hyperkalemia, an increasingly important management strategy. Patients should also receive sick day guidance advising them to hold RAAS inhibitors and diuretics during acute illness with significant volume depletion from vomiting, diarrhea, or fever with poor oral intake, to prevent AKI.
Absolute indications for discontinuation include potassium persistently above 5.5–6.0 mEq/L despite dose reduction and dietary potassium restriction; creatinine rise above 30–50% above baseline not explained by reversible causes and not resolving with dose reduction; confirmed bilateral renal artery stenosis or stenosis to a solitary kidney; pregnancy, which is an absolute contraindication requiring immediate switching; severe hypotension with systolic BP below 90 mmHg; and acute concurrent illness with hemodynamic compromise, in which the drug should be held temporarily.
At this stage, renal function is preserved or mildly reduced. The approach mirrors that for the general hypertensive population, with the addition of RAAS inhibition when proteinuria is present. When albuminuria is above 30 mg/g, the first-line agent is an ACEi or ARB for renoprotection and antiproteinuric effect, with a CCB (amlodipine) or thiazide-like diuretic added for additional BP control. The target is below 130/80 mmHg per KDIGO 2021.1 Without albuminuria, the standard four-class framework applies and RAAS inhibitors are acceptable but not mandated, with CCBs and thiazide-like diuretics being particularly effective.
This is the most clinically important stage for pharmacological decision-making. Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics retain partial but progressively reduced efficacy as eGFR falls through this range. RAAS inhibitors remain first-line with albuminuria and should be continued if already initiated, with close monitoring of creatinine and potassium with dose changes. CCBs, particularly amlodipine, are highly effective with no dose adjustment required and no adverse renal effects. The CLICK trial (2021) demonstrated that chlorthalidone 12.5–25 mg reduced 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP by 11 mmHg versus placebo in patients with Stage 4 CKD on optimal background therapy including RAAS inhibitors, confirming efficacy at this advanced stage.8 Indapamide retains efficacy at lower eGFR than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and has a favorable metabolic profile.
Regarding diuretic transition, at eGFR 30–45 mL/min/1.73m² (Stage 3b), thiazide efficacy is substantially reduced and adding or transitioning to a loop diuretic should be considered if volume control is inadequate. Renal function and potassium should be monitored every 3 months in stable Stage 3 CKD on RAAS inhibition, with more frequent monitoring after dose changes, intercurrent illness, or addition of any nephrotoxin.
This stage requires the most careful pharmacological selection. RAAS inhibitors can be continued with careful monitoring if potassium is controlled below 5.0 mEq/L and creatinine is stable or acceptably elevated. The benefit-risk calculation favors continuation for renoprotection and cardiovascular protection even at eGFR 15–29. Fosinopril, which has dual renal and hepatic elimination, is the preferred ACEi, and telmisartan, which has biliary elimination, is the preferred ARB. Loop diuretics become the first-line diuretic class at this stage, as thiazides are largely ineffective below eGFR 30 mL/min/1.73m². Torsemide is preferred over furosemide for superior oral bioavailability and more predictable response. CCBs require no dose adjustment and remain highly effective and safe across all CKD stages, with amlodipine as the preferred dihydropyridine CCB. Non-DHP CCBs can be used but add a constipation burden to a population often already affected by uremic constipation.
Regarding potassium-sparing diuretics and MRAs: spironolactone and eplerenone should be used with extreme caution in Stage 4 CKD due to high hyperkalemia risk with concurrent RAAS inhibition. Finerenone, the non-steroidal MRA, was studied in the FIDELIO-diabetic kidney disease (DKD) trial to eGFR as low as 25 mL/min/1.73m² and demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefit in diabetic CKD with acceptable hyperkalemia rates, making it the preferred MRA in Stage 4 diabetic CKD on background RAAS inhibition.12
Among beta-blockers, bisoprolol is preferred in advanced CKD due to dual elimination (approximately 50% hepatic, 50% renal), providing more predictable drug levels than purely renally eliminated agents such as atenolol, which accumulates in advanced CKD and requires dose adjustment. Carvedilol and metoprolol are hepatically metabolized and are reasonable options.
Gadolinium-based contrast carries a risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in severe CKD; group II and III agents are safer at lower eGFR but should still be avoided when eGFR is below 30 unless essential.
Before dialysis at eGFR below 15, loop diuretics at high doses (furosemide 80–200 mg twice daily or torsemide 40–100 mg once daily) are used to maintain any residual urine output and sodium excretion. RAAS inhibitors should be continued for residual renal function and cardiovascular protection if potassium is manageable, stopping only if causing dangerous hyperkalemia (potassium above 6.0 mEq/L unresponsive to other measures). CCBs remain effective and safe. Volume control is the dominant mechanism of BP management at this stage.
On hemodialysis, BP is primarily controlled by ultrafiltration and sodium removal during dialysis sessions, and interdialytic weight gain is a key driver of hypertension. ACEi and ARBs may provide cardiovascular outcome benefit in dialysis patients; some are removed by dialysis (lisinopril, enalapril may require supplemental dosing post-dialysis), while telmisartan and candesartan are not significantly dialyzed and are preferred. Long-acting agents are preferred for between-dialysis hypertension management. On peritoneal dialysis (PD), hypertension is very common, and ACEi and ARBs may preserve residual renal function in PD patients, where residual function is better preserved than in hemodialysis. All standard antihypertensive classes can be used in PD.
The KDIGO 2021 Blood Pressure Guideline recommends a target systolic BP below 120 mmHg for most adult patients with CKD when tolerated, based on standardized BP measurement.1 This aligns with the SPRINT intensive target, noting that SPRINT used automated unattended BP measurement that yields readings approximately 5–10 mmHg lower than standard attended measurement, meaning the SPRINT 120 mmHg target approximates 130–135 mmHg by standard measurement. SPRINT enrolled significant numbers of CKD patients and showed benefit of intensive control, though at the cost of higher rates of AKI and electrolyte abnormalities. The ACC/AHA 2017 guideline recommends a target below 130/80 mmHg for all patients with CKD with or without albuminuria.2 The 2018 ESC/ESH guideline recommends a target of 130–139/70–79 mmHg, with lower targets acceptable in younger patients with high proteinuria.10
Patients with CKD and significant proteinuria above 300 mg per day or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) above 300 mg/g appear to derive greater benefit from lower BP targets, as the antiproteinuric response to lower BP further slows CKD progression. Reduction of proteinuria should be a co-primary treatment goal alongside systolic BP control.
A J-shaped relationship between BP and adverse outcomes, where both very high and very low BP are associated with worse outcomes, is a theoretical concern in CKD, particularly in advanced stages where cardiovascular disease is ubiquitous. The practical implication is to avoid aggressive lowering of diastolic BP below 65–70 mmHg, particularly in older patients with CKD and established coronary artery disease, due to the risk of reduced coronary perfusion. Orthostatic hypotension should be monitored, particularly in elderly CKD patients on multiple antihypertensives and diuretics. Frail elderly patients with advanced CKD may not tolerate the BP targets achieved in clinical trials and may benefit from less aggressive targets to prevent falls, syncope, and AKI.
The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a landmark class for CKD management, with cardiovascular and renal benefits that extend well beyond their glucose-lowering effects.9,11 Their antihypertensive mechanisms include SGLT2 inhibition in the proximal tubule reducing glucose and sodium co-reabsorption, promoting osmotic diuresis and natriuresis with a modest but consistent systolic BP reduction of approximately 3–5 mmHg and diastolic reduction of 1–2 mmHg; modest body weight reduction of 2–3 kg with reduced visceral adiposity; and reduction of intraglomerular pressure through tubuloglomerular feedback restoration. This last mechanism involves increased distal sodium delivery to the macula densa restoring tubuloglomerular feedback and causing afferent arteriolar constriction, reducing intraglomerular pressure.
The CREDENCE trial (2019) showed that canagliflozin in type 2 diabetes with CKD (eGFR 30–90 mL/min/1.73m² and UACR 300 mg/g or above) on background RAAS inhibition produced a 40% relative risk reduction in the primary composite renal endpoint and a 30% reduction in ESRD.11 The DAPA-CKD trial (2020) demonstrated that dapagliflozin in CKD (eGFR 25–75 mL/min/1.73m² and UACR 200 mg/g or above) with or without diabetes produced a 39% reduction in the primary composite endpoint, the first trial to show renal benefit independent of diabetes status.9 The EMPA-KIDNEY trial (2022) showed that empagliflozin in CKD at eGFR as low as 20 produced a 28% reduction in composite kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death. Current KDIGO 2022 diabetes management guidelines and ADA standards now recommend SGLT2 inhibitors for all patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD (eGFR 20 or above) as add-on to metformin and RAAS inhibition, with SGLT2 inhibitors increasingly recommended in non-diabetic CKD with significant albuminuria as well.
Finerenone, the non-steroidal MRA, has demonstrated dual cardiovascular and renal benefit in type 2 diabetic CKD. The FIDELIO-DKD trial (2020) randomized patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD (eGFR 25–75 and UACR 300 mg/g or above) on maximum tolerated RAAS inhibition to finerenone versus placebo, finding an 18% reduction in the primary composite kidney outcome (sustained eGFR decline of 40% or more, ESRD, or renal death) and a 14% reduction in the cardiovascular composite endpoint.12 FIGARO-DKD (2021) enrolled patients with a lower albuminuria range (UACR 30–300 mg/g) and found a significant reduction in the cardiovascular composite endpoint. The FIDELITY pooled analysis of both trials confirmed that finerenone significantly reduced both cardiovascular and renal composite endpoints across the full spectrum of CKD severity and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes.
Finerenone is approved as add-on therapy to RAAS inhibition for type 2 diabetic CKD with significant albuminuria and should be considered in all eligible patients, particularly those with persistent albuminuria despite optimized RAAS inhibition and SGLT2 inhibitor use. The combination of RAAS inhibitor plus SGLT2 inhibitor plus finerenone represents the emerging triple renoprotective strategy in type 2 diabetic CKD.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2021;99(3S):S1–S87.
doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.11.003Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127–e248.
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy (RENAAL). N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861–869.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011161Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(20):1456–1462.
doi:10.1056/NEJM199311113292004Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy (RENAAL). N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861–869.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011161Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes (IDNT). N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):851–860.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011303Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia (GISEN). Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy (REIN trial). Lancet. 1997;349(9069):1857–1863.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11445-8Agarwal R, Sinha AD, Cramer AE, et al. Chlorthalidone for hypertension in advanced chronic kidney disease (CLICK trial). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2507–2519.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2110730Heerspink HJL, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease (DAPA-CKD). N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1436–1446.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2024816Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy (CREDENCE). N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–2306.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1811744Bakris GL, Agarwal R, Anker SD, et al. Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (FIDELIO-DKD). N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2219–2229.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2025845Fried LF, Emanuele N, Zhang JH, et al. Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy (VA NEPHRON-D). N Engl J Med. 2013;369(20):1892–1903.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1303154Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunstrom M, et al. 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2023;41(12):1874–2071.
doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480Wheeler DC, Stefansson BV, Jongs N, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney events in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (DAPA-CKD prespecified analysis). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(1):22–31.
doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30369-7