Medical Pharmacology Chapter 35  Antibacterial Drugs

Section Table of Contents

Site Table of Contents

Previous Page

Next Page

  • First Generation Cephalosporins:  Cefadroxil

    • Cefadroxil Pharmacodynamics: The fT > MIC Target 2 

      • As a β-lactam antibiotic, cefadroxil exhibits time-dependent bactericidal activity.

        • Time -dependent bactericidal activity means its efficacy is not correlated with the peak concentration (CMax) it achieves, but rather with the duration of time that the free drug concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) of the target organism.

          • "fT refers to the percentage of time the free (unbound) concentration of a beta-lactam antibiotic stays above the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of a pathogen during dosing interval, i.e. %fT>MIC)

        • The typical pharmacodynamic (PD) target for cephalosporins to achieve bacteriostasis and efficacy in most clinical infections is an fT > MIC of 40-50% of the dosing interval.

        • Here pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship is apparent PK/PD integration becomes clear.3,4

          • Cefadroxil's longer half-life results in a longer fT > MIC for any given dose and MIC value, compared to cephalexin.

            • Accordingly, cefadroxil may be dosed less frequently compared to cephalexin.

    • Cefadroxil Antimicrobial Spectrum and In Vitro Activity

       

      • As a first-generation cephalosporin, cefadroxil's spectrum of activity is focuses on Gram-positive organisms but exhibits clinically useful activity against a select group of Gram-negative bacilli.5,6,7  

        • Gram-Positive Anaerobes: Principal Targets for Cefadroxil

           

          • Gram-Positive Anaerobes: Some Principal Targets for Cefadroxil

             

             

          • Gram-Positive Anaerobes: Some Principal Targets for Cefadroxil

             

          •  

            Gram-Positive Anaerobes: Some Principal Targets for Cefadroxil

          • Staphylococcus aureus10,11,12

            • Cefadroxil demonstrates excellent activity against Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), which includes strains that produce penicillinase (a beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes penicillin but not cephalosporins).

              • Cefadroxil remains a first-line oral agent for confirmed MSSA infections.2,9

          • Streptococcus species:

            • It is highly active against Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci, or GAS), the causative agent of pharyngitis

              • Cefadroxil is also active against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

          • In Vitro Potency (MIC Data)2

            • When its potency is formally tested, cefadroxil activity is confirmed.

              • For MSSA isolates collected from pediatric patients with musculoskeletal infections, the in vitro activity of cefadroxil was found to be equivalent to that of cephalexin.

                • Both drugs shared an MIC50 (concentration to inhibit 50% of isolates) of 2 µg/mL and an MIC90 (concentration to inhibit 90% of isolates) of 4 µg/mL.

        • Gram-Negative Aerobes (Urinary Tract Infections)11,13  

          • Cefadroxil's Gram-negative activity is limited to a few key species, primarily those responsible for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

            • Cefadroxil in vitro activity and activity in clinical infections include:

              •  Escherichia coli

              • Klebsiella species (e.g., K. pneumoniae), and

              • Proteus mirabilis

            • Rationale for FDA's Position on Cefadroxil
              • "Cefadroxil is FDA-approved for the treatment of:

                • Urinary tract infections caused by E. coli, P. mirabilis, and Klebsiella species.

                • Skin and skin structure infections cause by staphylococci and/or streptococci.

                • Pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci).

              • The cefadroxil webpage on the FDA Antibacterial Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria (STIC) website does not provide minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or disk diffusion breakpoints but includes a statement that, “Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to cefadroxil may be deduced from testing cefazolin.”

              • However, the cefazolin webpage on the FDA STIC website states that,  'Separate susceptibility test interpretive criteria for Enterobacteriaceae for therapy of uncomplicated urinary tract infections are not recognized at this time.'

              • Furthermore, it has been shown that cefazolin surrogate susceptibility breakpoints do not accurately predict cefadroxil activity against Enterobacterales due to an unacceptably high false-susceptible rate.

                • To note, cefadroxil STIC, either direct or surrogate, are not provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), CLSI M100 Ed32:2022.

              • Based on the information noted above, the Agency has determined that the following statement should be removed from the FDA STIC webpage for cefadroxil: “Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to cefadroxil may be deduced from testing cefazolin.” (5/4/2022)

       

      • FDA-Approved Indications

        • Skin and Skin Structure Infections (SSTIs)

        • Pharyngitis and/or Tonsillitis

        • Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)

            • Skin and Skin Structure Infections (SSTIs)

              • Indication

                • Cefadroxil is indicated for the treatment of mild-to-moderate SSTIs.

                  • These indications include common presentations such as cellulitis, cutaneous abscesses (post-incision and drainage), furunculosis, and impetigo.10,12,13 

              • Pathogens

                • Cefadroxil indicated use is specifically for infections caused by Staphylococci (MSSA) and/or Streptococci, the two most common pathogens in this setting.

              • Clinical Evidence15,16,17

                • In appropriate settings, see above, cefadroxil appears to be both they highly effective and reasonable choice.

                  • Its pharmacological profile is ideally suited for this indication, given excellent skin and soft tissue distribution with improved penetration into skin-blister fluid compared to cephalexin.

                  • These factors, along with potent activity against both staphylococcal and streptococcal infection makes cefadroxil a first-line agent for uncomplicated, non-purulent cellulitis (likely streptococcal) or as oral therapy for mild purulent infections (staphylococcal).

            • Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis (Group A Streptococcus)

              • Indication10,12,13

                • Cefadroxil is indicated for the treatment of pharyngitis and tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-Hemolytic Streptococci, or GAS).

              • Clinical Context18

                • Treatment of pharyngitis and tonsillitis highlight some pharmacological advantages of cefadroxil administration.

                  • Primary goals of treating Group A β-Hemolytic Streptococci pharyngitis involves not only symptomatic improvement, but also complete bacteriological eradication of S. pyogenes from the nasopharynx.

                  • This approach addresses prevention of non-suppurative sequelae of acute rheumatic fever.

            • Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)

              • Indication

                • Cefadroxil is indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs (e.g., cystitis) due to susceptible strains of E. coli, P. mirabilis, and Klebsiella species.10,12,13

              • Clinical Discussion19 

                • The role of cefadroxil in treating UTIs describes evolution of antimicrobial agents of choice.

                  • For many years, first-generation cephalosporins were relegated to second-line status, as result of perceived superiority of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and, more recently, the widespread use of fluoroquinolones.19 

              • Fluoroquinolone-Sparing Approach

                • The contemporary antibacterial era is defined both by widespread antimicrobial resistance and a new appreciation for antibiotic-associated toxicity.

                • Amidst the crisis of "bad bugs, few drugs"19   and mounting concerns over fluoroquinolone-driven resistance and their black-box warnings for serious adverse events (e.g., tendon rupture, aortic dissection), cefadroxil is being  reevaluated as a highly valuable, narrow-spectrum, fluoroquinolone-sparing alternative.19 

              • The pharmacokinetic profile of cefadroxil appears ideal for treating cystitis.

                • Cefadroxil is well-absorbed orally, is not metabolized, and administration results in bactericidal concentrations of active drug directly at the site of infection, the urine.

                • For a confirmed susceptible E. coli cystitis, cefadroxil (or cephalexin) is now considered a preferred, first-line choice.5,19

    • Adverse Reactions

      • The most common adverse reactions are gastrointestinal and hypersensitivity.20,21,22

        • Gastrointestinal adverse effects include:

          • Diarrhea

          • Nausea

          • Vomiting

          • Abdominal discomfort, and

        • Hypersensitivity reactions include benign maculopapular rash or urticaria, which are usually mild and reversible upon discontinuation.

      • Cefadroxil administration has been associated with:

        •  Clostridioides difficile–associated diarrhea ss well as pseudomembranous colitis

          • These effects  may appear during therapy or weeks afterward and should be considered in patients with new‑onset severe or bloody diarrhea.

December 2025
 

Section Table of Contents

Site Table of Contents

 

 

References
  1. MacDougall C Chapter 58 Cell Envelope Disruptors: In Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (Brunton LL Knollman BC eds) McGraw Hill LLC (2023).

  2. Haynes A Wei Z Anderson P Scheetz M OParker S Fish D Cefadroxil and cephalexin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with musculoskeletal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 April 10;68(5). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064491/#

  3. Pfeiffer M Jackson A Ximenes J de Menezes P Comparative human oral clinical pharmacology of cefadroxil, cephalexin, and cephradine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 February;11(2): 331-338. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/848940/

  4. Chen K Van Roy Z What is the rationale by dosing frequency of cefadroxil for the treatment of MSSA infections? University of Nebraska Medical Center (PharmToExamTable). April 6, 2022. https://blog.unmc.edu/infectious-disease/2022/04/06/pharmtoexamtable-what-is-the-rationale-behind-twice-daily-dosing-of-cefadroxil-for-treatment-of-mssa-bacteremia/

  5. Cefadroxil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cefadroxil

  6. Buio T Patel P Preuss C Cephalosporins. StatPearls National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551517/

  7. Ripa S Prenna Laboratory studies with BL-S 578 (Cefadroxil) they knew brought-spectrum orally active cephalosporin. Chemotherapy. 1979;25(1): 9-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33784/

  8. Nguyen S Minejima E P-873. Efficacy and Safety of Cefadroxil for Oral Transitional Therapy for Staphylococcal and Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 12, Issue Supplement_1, February 2025.

  9. Funk O Bradley N A Review of Oral Cephalosporins for Common Outpatien Infections. Pharmacy Times. July 25, 2025. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/a-review-of-oral-cephalosporins-for-common-outpatient-infections

  10. Cefadroxil (Duricef) capsule and powder for suspension. Texas Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cefadroxil-monograph.pdf

  11. Cefadroxil. DrugBank. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01140

  12. Cefadroxil (Monograph). Drugs.com. https://www.drugs.com/monograph/cefadroxil.html

  13. Rationale for FDA's Position on Cefadroxil. (May 4, 2022). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/rationale-fdas-position-cefadroxil

  14. Cordero A Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections with cefadroxil, a new oral cephalosporin. J Int Med Res. 1976;4(3): 176-178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1026545/

  15. Bernhardt L Tissue and fluid concentrations of cefadroxil monohydrate. J Int Med Res. 1980;8(Suppl 1): 58-63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7439507/

  16. Stevens D Bisno A Chamberts H Dellinger E Goldsteiin E Gorbach S Hirschmann J Kapolan S Montoya J Wade J Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Tissue kept infections: 2014 Update by IDSA (published July 15, 2014). Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 595, Issue 2, 15 July 2014, e10-e52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7439507/

  17. Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrobial Stewardship Collaborative of South Carolina https://echo.sc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Outpatient-ABSSSI-and-Bites-Guidelines_final-7.13.22.pdf

  18. Cefadroxil dosage. Drugs.com . February 28, 2025. https://www.drugs.com/dosage/cefadroxil.html

  19. Nguyen H Graber C A Critical Review of Cephalexin and Cefadroxil for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection in the Era of "Bad Bugs, Few Drugs" Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 October;56(4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32659466/

  20. Cunha J Cefadroxil (cefadroxil hemihydrate). Last updated (RxList): 5/22/2023. https://www.rxlist.com/cefadroxil-drug.htm

  21. Cefadroxil (oral route) Mayo Clinic. (Drugs & Supplements). https://www.rxlist.com/cefadroxil-drug.htm

  22. Cefadroxil. MEDLINEplus. National Library of Medicine. Revise 11/15/2018. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682730.html

 

 

This Web-based pharmacology and disease-based integrated teaching site is based on reference materials, that are believed reliable and consistent with standards accepted at the time of development. Possibility of human error and on-going research and development in medical sciences do not allow assurance that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete. Users should confirm the information contained herein with other sources. This site should only be considered as a teaching aid for undergraduate and graduate biomedical education and is intended only as a teaching site. Information contained here should not be used for patient management and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with practicing medical professionals. Users of this website should check the product information sheet included in the package of any drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this site is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for administration.  Advertisements that appear on this site are not reviewed for content accuracy and it is the responsibility of users of this website to make individual assessments concerning this information.  Medical or other information  thus obtained should not be used as a substitute for consultation with practicing medical or scientific or other professionals.